public inbox for gcc-bugs@sourceware.org help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "steven at gcc dot gnu dot org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org> To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug tree-optimization/42494] [4.4 Regression] Missed dead-code-elimination Date: Thu, 07 Jan 2010 21:30:00 -0000 [thread overview] Message-ID: <20100107212959.24447.qmail@sourceware.org> (raw) In-Reply-To: <bug-42494-17572@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/> ------- Comment #8 from steven at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-01-07 21:29 ------- The diff between -O2 and -Os starts in combine: diff -ur O2/t.c.175r.combine Os/t.c.175r.combine --- O2/t.c.175r.combine 2010-01-07 22:24:04.000000000 +0100 +++ Os/t.c.175r.combine 2010-01-07 22:23:14.000000000 +0100 @@ -4,18 +4,20 @@ starting the processing of deferred insns ending the processing of deferred insns df_analyze called -insn_cost 7: 12 +insn_cost 7: 8 insn_cost 8: 4 insn_cost 9: 4 -insn_cost 10: 12 -insn_cost 11: 12 +insn_cost 10: 8 +insn_cost 11: 4 insn_cost 12: 4 -insn_cost 46: 4 -insn_cost 17: 12 +insn_cost 46: 16 +insn_cost 17: 8 insn_cost 19: 4 -rejecting combination of insns 12 and 46 -original costs 4 + 4 = 8 -replacement cost 12 +deferring deletion of insn with uid = 12. +modifying insn i3 46 {r133:SI={(r138:SI!=0x0)?0x2:0x0};clobber cc:CC;} + REG_UNUSED: cc:CC + REG_DEAD: r138:SI +deferring rescan insn with uid = 46. (note# 0 # 2 [bb 2] NOTE_INSN_BASIC_BLOCK) (note# # # 2 NOTE_INSN_FUNCTION_BEG) @@ -40,16 +42,17 @@ (expr_list:REG_EQUAL (mem/c/i:SI (symbol_ref:SI ("bool_var") [flags 0xc0] <var_decl # bool_var>) [2 bool_var+0 S4 A32]) (nil)))) -(insn# # # 2 t.c:13 (set (reg:CC 24 cc) - (compare:CC (reg:SI 138 [ bool_var ]) - (const_int 0 [0x0])))# {*arm_cmpsi_insn} (nil)) - -(insn# # # 2 t.c:8 (set (reg/v:SI 133 [ flags ]) - (if_then_else:SI (eq (reg:CC 24 cc) - (const_int 0 [0x0])) - (reg:SI 138 [ bool_var ]) - (const_int 2 [0x2])))# {*movsicc_insn} (expr_list:REG_DEAD (reg:SI 138 [ bool_var ]) - (expr_list:REG_DEAD (reg:CC 24 cc) +(note# # # 2 NOTE_INSN_DELETED) + +(insn# # # 2 t.c:8 (parallel [ + (set (reg/v:SI 133 [ flags ]) + (if_then_else:SI (ne (reg:SI 138 [ bool_var ]) + (const_int 0 [0x0])) + (const_int 2 [0x2]) + (const_int 0 [0x0]))) + (clobber (reg:CC 24 cc)) + ])# {movcond} (expr_list:REG_UNUSED (reg:CC 24 cc) + (expr_list:REG_DEAD (reg:SI 138 [ bool_var ]) (nil)))) (insn# # # 2 t.c:14 (set (reg/f:SI 139) @@ -60,7 +63,10 @@ (expr_list:REG_DEAD (reg/v:SI 133 [ flags ]) (nil)))) starting the processing of deferred insns +deleting insn with uid = 12. +rescanning insn with uid = 46. +deleting insn with uid = 46. ending the processing of deferred insns -;; Combiner totals: 12 attempts, 12 substitutions (2 requiring new space), -;; 0 successes. +;; Combiner totals: 13 attempts, 13 substitutions (2 requiring new space), +;; 1 successes. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42494
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-01-07 21:30 UTC|newest] Thread overview: 26+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top 2009-12-25 5:42 [Bug c/42494] New: Regression on dead-code-elimination: GCC 4.2.1 generates better code than 4.4.0 sliao at google dot com 2009-12-29 10:35 ` [Bug c/42494] [4.4 only] " ramana at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-12-29 11:31 ` [Bug c/42494] [4.4 Regression] Missed " steven at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-12-29 12:45 ` [Bug tree-optimization/42494] " ramana at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-12-30 23:21 ` [Bug tree-optimization/42494] [4.4 Regression] Missed dead-code-elimination rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-12-30 23:34 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-12-31 15:36 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-01-07 9:19 ` sliao at google dot com 2010-01-07 9:49 ` steven at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-01-07 21:30 ` steven at gcc dot gnu dot org [this message] 2010-01-07 21:36 ` steven at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-01-07 22:08 ` steven at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-01-07 22:08 ` steven at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-01-21 13:19 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-02-08 16:45 ` steven at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-04-30 8:58 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org [not found] <bug-42494-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/> 2010-10-01 11:59 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-04-16 11:02 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-04-16 11:29 ` jingyu at google dot com 2011-05-13 19:46 ` lacombar at gmail dot com 2011-05-13 20:19 ` jingyu at google dot com 2011-05-13 20:51 ` lacombar at gmail dot com 2011-05-18 11:21 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-05-18 11:46 ` jingyu at google dot com 2011-05-18 15:29 ` lacombar at gmail dot com 2012-03-13 16:01 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
Reply instructions: You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email using any one of the following methods: * Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client, and reply-to-all from there: mbox Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style * Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to switches of git-send-email(1): git send-email \ --in-reply-to=20100107212959.24447.qmail@sourceware.org \ --to=gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org \ --cc=gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org \ /path/to/YOUR_REPLY https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html * If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header via mailto: links, try the mailto: linkBe sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox; as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).