* [Bug libstdc++/42573] shrink_to_fit() missing
2010-01-01 16:05 [Bug libstdc++/42573] New: shrink_to_fit() missing nico at josuttis dot de
@ 2010-01-01 17:08 ` paolo dot carlini at oracle dot com
2010-01-07 16:42 ` [Bug libstdc++/42573] [C++0x] " paolo dot carlini at oracle dot com
` (7 subsequent siblings)
8 siblings, 0 replies; 10+ messages in thread
From: paolo dot carlini at oracle dot com @ 2010-01-01 17:08 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Comment #1 from paolo dot carlini at oracle dot com 2010-01-01 17:08 -------
Yeah, *a lot* of C++0x things are missing, or still incorrectly implemented, in
general we are not tracking in Bugzilla each!
--
paolo dot carlini at oracle dot com changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC|nico at josuttis dot de |
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
GCC build triplet|-std=c++0x |
Resolution| |INVALID
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42573
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread* [Bug libstdc++/42573] [C++0x] shrink_to_fit() missing
2010-01-01 16:05 [Bug libstdc++/42573] New: shrink_to_fit() missing nico at josuttis dot de
2010-01-01 17:08 ` [Bug libstdc++/42573] " paolo dot carlini at oracle dot com
@ 2010-01-07 16:42 ` paolo dot carlini at oracle dot com
2010-01-07 16:42 ` paolo dot carlini at oracle dot com
` (6 subsequent siblings)
8 siblings, 0 replies; 10+ messages in thread
From: paolo dot carlini at oracle dot com @ 2010-01-07 16:42 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Comment #2 from paolo dot carlini at oracle dot com 2010-01-07 16:42 -------
Ok, let's re-open this and add the basic implementation in time for gcc4.5
(C++0x mode only of course).
--
paolo dot carlini at oracle dot com changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|RESOLVED |UNCONFIRMED
Resolution|INVALID |
Summary|shrink_to_fit() missing |[C++0x] shrink_to_fit()
| |missing
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42573
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread* [Bug libstdc++/42573] [C++0x] shrink_to_fit() missing
2010-01-01 16:05 [Bug libstdc++/42573] New: shrink_to_fit() missing nico at josuttis dot de
2010-01-01 17:08 ` [Bug libstdc++/42573] " paolo dot carlini at oracle dot com
2010-01-07 16:42 ` [Bug libstdc++/42573] [C++0x] " paolo dot carlini at oracle dot com
@ 2010-01-07 16:42 ` paolo dot carlini at oracle dot com
2010-01-07 23:18 ` paolo dot carlini at oracle dot com
` (5 subsequent siblings)
8 siblings, 0 replies; 10+ messages in thread
From: paolo dot carlini at oracle dot com @ 2010-01-07 16:42 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
--
paolo dot carlini at oracle dot com changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
AssignedTo|unassigned at gcc dot gnu |paolo dot carlini at oracle
|dot org |dot com
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Ever Confirmed|0 |1
Last reconfirmed|0000-00-00 00:00:00 |2010-01-07 16:42:32
date| |
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42573
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread* [Bug libstdc++/42573] [C++0x] shrink_to_fit() missing
2010-01-01 16:05 [Bug libstdc++/42573] New: shrink_to_fit() missing nico at josuttis dot de
` (2 preceding siblings ...)
2010-01-07 16:42 ` paolo dot carlini at oracle dot com
@ 2010-01-07 23:18 ` paolo dot carlini at oracle dot com
2010-01-08 10:05 ` jwakely dot gcc at gmail dot com
` (4 subsequent siblings)
8 siblings, 0 replies; 10+ messages in thread
From: paolo dot carlini at oracle dot com @ 2010-01-07 23:18 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Comment #3 from paolo dot carlini at oracle dot com 2010-01-07 23:17 -------
Nope... I went through this and came to the conclusion that a fairly good
implementation has to wait for a complete resolution of N2983: the request is
non-binding thus if the move constructor can throw and the type T isn't
CopyConstructible the implementation should not do anything. Given the
subtleties wrt throwing move constructors recently surfaced, I think we'll add
this member in due course, in any case *after* having tweaked the internals of
the std containers for the other traditional member functions...
--
paolo dot carlini at oracle dot com changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|ASSIGNED |RESOLVED
Resolution| |INVALID
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42573
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread* [Bug libstdc++/42573] [C++0x] shrink_to_fit() missing
2010-01-01 16:05 [Bug libstdc++/42573] New: shrink_to_fit() missing nico at josuttis dot de
` (3 preceding siblings ...)
2010-01-07 23:18 ` paolo dot carlini at oracle dot com
@ 2010-01-08 10:05 ` jwakely dot gcc at gmail dot com
2010-01-08 10:29 ` paolo dot carlini at oracle dot com
` (3 subsequent siblings)
8 siblings, 0 replies; 10+ messages in thread
From: jwakely dot gcc at gmail dot com @ 2010-01-08 10:05 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Comment #4 from jwakely dot gcc at gmail dot com 2010-01-08 10:05 -------
It would be conforming to add the function with an empty body ;)
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42573
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread* [Bug libstdc++/42573] [C++0x] shrink_to_fit() missing
2010-01-01 16:05 [Bug libstdc++/42573] New: shrink_to_fit() missing nico at josuttis dot de
` (4 preceding siblings ...)
2010-01-08 10:05 ` jwakely dot gcc at gmail dot com
@ 2010-01-08 10:29 ` paolo dot carlini at oracle dot com
2010-01-08 10:46 ` paolo dot carlini at oracle dot com
` (2 subsequent siblings)
8 siblings, 0 replies; 10+ messages in thread
From: paolo dot carlini at oracle dot com @ 2010-01-08 10:29 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Comment #5 from paolo dot carlini at oracle dot com 2010-01-08 10:29 -------
Good joke and also good point Jon: I still believe that our C++0x user
interfaces, even not considering the semantics, aren't yet such complete and
otherwise perfect to grant that action, but all in all, if somebody wants to
add the empty bodies with a BIG TODO comment in the code, I do not object...
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42573
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread* [Bug libstdc++/42573] [C++0x] shrink_to_fit() missing
2010-01-01 16:05 [Bug libstdc++/42573] New: shrink_to_fit() missing nico at josuttis dot de
` (5 preceding siblings ...)
2010-01-08 10:29 ` paolo dot carlini at oracle dot com
@ 2010-01-08 10:46 ` paolo dot carlini at oracle dot com
2010-01-08 13:01 ` paolo at gcc dot gnu dot org
2010-01-08 13:06 ` paolo dot carlini at oracle dot com
8 siblings, 0 replies; 10+ messages in thread
From: paolo dot carlini at oracle dot com @ 2010-01-08 10:46 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Comment #6 from paolo dot carlini at oracle dot com 2010-01-08 10:46 -------
Ok, Jon, you convinced me: I'll add the interfaces, and a very, very basic
implementation for vector and deque for now, I think just do something for PODs
(reminder to ourselves, change the dispatches in unitialized_* functions, etc,
to use to most strict yet correct traits)
--
paolo dot carlini at oracle dot com changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|RESOLVED |REOPENED
Resolution|INVALID |
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42573
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread* [Bug libstdc++/42573] [C++0x] shrink_to_fit() missing
2010-01-01 16:05 [Bug libstdc++/42573] New: shrink_to_fit() missing nico at josuttis dot de
` (6 preceding siblings ...)
2010-01-08 10:46 ` paolo dot carlini at oracle dot com
@ 2010-01-08 13:01 ` paolo at gcc dot gnu dot org
2010-01-08 13:06 ` paolo dot carlini at oracle dot com
8 siblings, 0 replies; 10+ messages in thread
From: paolo at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2010-01-08 13:01 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Comment #7 from paolo at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-01-08 13:01 -------
Subject: Bug 42573
Author: paolo
Date: Fri Jan 8 13:01:24 2010
New Revision: 155733
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=155733
Log:
2010-01-08 Paolo Carlini <paolo.carlini@oracle.com>
PR libstdc++/42573
* include/bits/allocator.h (struct __shrink_to_fit): Add.
* include/bits/stl_deque.h (deque<>::shrink_to_fit): Add.
* include/bits/stl_vector.h (vector<>::shrink_to_fit): Likewise.
* include/bits/stl_bvector.h (vector<bool>::shrink_to_fit): Likewise.
* include/bits/basic_string.h (basic_string<>::shrink_to_fit):
Likewise.
* include/ext/vstring.h (__versa_string<>::shrink_to_fit): Likewise.
* include/debug/deque: Add corresponding using declaration.
* include/debug/vector: Likewise.
* include/debug/string: Likewise.
* include/profile/deque: Likewise.
* include/profile/vector: Likewise.
* config/abi/pre/gnu.ver: Export new symbols.
* testsuite/23_containers/deque/capacity/shrink_to_fit.cc: New.
* testsuite/23_containers/vector/capacity/shrink_to_fit.cc: Likewise.
* testsuite/21_strings/basic_string/capacity/char/shrink_to_fit.cc:
Likewise.
* testsuite/21_strings/basic_string/capacity/wchar_t/shrink_to_fit.cc:
Likewise.
* testsuite/ext/vstring/capacity/shrink_to_fit.cc: Likewise.
* testsuite/23_containers/deque/requirements/dr438/assign_neg.cc:
Adjust dg-error line number.
* testsuite/23_containers/deque/requirements/dr438/insert_neg.cc:
Likewise.
* testsuite/23_containers/deque/requirements/dr438/
constructor_1_neg.cc: Likewise.
* testsuite/23_containers/deque/requirements/dr438/
constructor_2_neg.cc: Likewise.
* testsuite/23_containers/vector/requirements/dr438/assign_neg.cc:
Adjust dg-error line number.
* testsuite/23_containers/vector/requirements/dr438/insert_neg.cc:
Likewise.
* testsuite/23_containers/vector/requirements/dr438/
constructor_1_neg.cc: Likewise.
* testsuite/23_containers/vector/requirements/dr438/
constructor_2_neg.cc: Likewise.
Added:
trunk/libstdc++-v3/testsuite/21_strings/basic_string/capacity/char/shrink_to_fit.cc
trunk/libstdc++-v3/testsuite/21_strings/basic_string/capacity/wchar_t/shrink_to_fit.cc
trunk/libstdc++-v3/testsuite/23_containers/deque/capacity/shrink_to_fit.cc
trunk/libstdc++-v3/testsuite/23_containers/vector/capacity/shrink_to_fit.cc
trunk/libstdc++-v3/testsuite/ext/vstring/capacity/shrink_to_fit.cc
Modified:
trunk/libstdc++-v3/ChangeLog
trunk/libstdc++-v3/config/abi/pre/gnu.ver
trunk/libstdc++-v3/include/bits/allocator.h
trunk/libstdc++-v3/include/bits/basic_string.h
trunk/libstdc++-v3/include/bits/stl_bvector.h
trunk/libstdc++-v3/include/bits/stl_deque.h
trunk/libstdc++-v3/include/bits/stl_vector.h
trunk/libstdc++-v3/include/debug/deque
trunk/libstdc++-v3/include/debug/string
trunk/libstdc++-v3/include/debug/vector
trunk/libstdc++-v3/include/ext/vstring.h
trunk/libstdc++-v3/include/profile/deque
trunk/libstdc++-v3/include/profile/vector
trunk/libstdc++-v3/testsuite/23_containers/deque/requirements/dr438/assign_neg.cc
trunk/libstdc++-v3/testsuite/23_containers/deque/requirements/dr438/constructor_1_neg.cc
trunk/libstdc++-v3/testsuite/23_containers/deque/requirements/dr438/constructor_2_neg.cc
trunk/libstdc++-v3/testsuite/23_containers/deque/requirements/dr438/insert_neg.cc
trunk/libstdc++-v3/testsuite/23_containers/vector/requirements/dr438/assign_neg.cc
trunk/libstdc++-v3/testsuite/23_containers/vector/requirements/dr438/constructor_1_neg.cc
trunk/libstdc++-v3/testsuite/23_containers/vector/requirements/dr438/constructor_2_neg.cc
trunk/libstdc++-v3/testsuite/23_containers/vector/requirements/dr438/insert_neg.cc
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42573
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread* [Bug libstdc++/42573] [C++0x] shrink_to_fit() missing
2010-01-01 16:05 [Bug libstdc++/42573] New: shrink_to_fit() missing nico at josuttis dot de
` (7 preceding siblings ...)
2010-01-08 13:01 ` paolo at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2010-01-08 13:06 ` paolo dot carlini at oracle dot com
8 siblings, 0 replies; 10+ messages in thread
From: paolo dot carlini at oracle dot com @ 2010-01-08 13:06 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Comment #8 from paolo dot carlini at oracle dot com 2010-01-08 13:06 -------
Done (within the limits explained in the audit trail).
--
paolo dot carlini at oracle dot com changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|REOPENED |RESOLVED
Resolution| |FIXED
Target Milestone|--- |4.5.0
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42573
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread