public inbox for gcc-bugs@sourceware.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "zadeck at naturalbridge dot com" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug rtl-optimization/42631] [4.5 Regression] "-fcompare-debug failure" with "-O1 -funroll-loops"
Date: Fri, 08 Jan 2010 01:56:00 -0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20100108015632.20623.qmail@sourceware.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <bug-42631-14164@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>



------- Comment #9 from zadeck at naturalbridge dot com  2010-01-08 01:56 -------
Alexandre, 
i am surprised that we have gotten this far and never seen this kind of
failure. 
I had actually thought that there were earlier passes that added
initialization.  If that is true, then the real question is why did they fail
to make this go away earlier.    

on the other hand, if there is nothing to resolve these earlier, then i guess
we need to fix it up here.   But again, i am surprised that this is the first
time we have seen this problem.  


-- 


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42631


  parent reply	other threads:[~2010-01-08  1:56 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2010-01-06  0:50 [Bug debug/42631] New: " zsojka at seznam dot cz
2010-01-06 12:00 ` [Bug rtl-optimization/42631] [4.5 Regression] " rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
2010-01-06 12:33 ` steven at gcc dot gnu dot org
2010-01-06 23:48 ` steven at gcc dot gnu dot org
2010-01-06 23:54 ` steven at gcc dot gnu dot org
2010-01-07 13:54 ` aoliva at gcc dot gnu dot org
2010-01-07 14:54 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
2010-01-07 19:55 ` steven at gcc dot gnu dot org
2010-01-07 20:44 ` aoliva at gcc dot gnu dot org
2010-01-08  1:01 ` aoliva at gcc dot gnu dot org
2010-01-08  1:27 ` aoliva at gcc dot gnu dot org
2010-01-08  1:56 ` zadeck at naturalbridge dot com [this message]
2010-01-08  2:44 ` aoliva at gcc dot gnu dot org
2010-01-08  3:52 ` zadeck at naturalbridge dot com
2010-01-08  5:27 ` aoliva at gcc dot gnu dot org
2010-01-09 14:42 ` aoliva at gcc dot gnu dot org
2010-01-09 14:50 ` aoliva at gcc dot gnu dot org
     [not found] <bug-42631-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
2011-02-05 12:06 ` jiez at gcc dot gnu.org
2011-02-10  4:23 ` jiez at gcc dot gnu.org

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20100108015632.20623.qmail@sourceware.org \
    --to=gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org \
    --cc=gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).