From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 20422 invoked by alias); 8 Jan 2010 10:29:24 -0000 Received: (qmail 20374 invoked by uid 48); 8 Jan 2010 10:29:13 -0000 Date: Fri, 08 Jan 2010 10:29:00 -0000 Message-ID: <20100108102913.20373.qmail@sourceware.org> X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC References: Subject: [Bug libstdc++/42573] [C++0x] shrink_to_fit() missing In-Reply-To: Reply-To: gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org From: "paolo dot carlini at oracle dot com" Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org X-SW-Source: 2010-01/txt/msg00918.txt.bz2 ------- Comment #5 from paolo dot carlini at oracle dot com 2010-01-08 10:29 ------- Good joke and also good point Jon: I still believe that our C++0x user interfaces, even not considering the semantics, aren't yet such complete and otherwise perfect to grant that action, but all in all, if somebody wants to add the empty bodies with a BIG TODO comment in the code, I do not object... -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42573