From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 24009 invoked by alias); 10 Jan 2010 23:42:55 -0000 Received: (qmail 23931 invoked by uid 48); 10 Jan 2010 23:42:45 -0000 Date: Sun, 10 Jan 2010 23:42:00 -0000 Message-ID: <20100110234245.23929.qmail@sourceware.org> X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC References: Subject: [Bug c++/42336] [4.5 Regression] ICE with pointer-to-member-function argument in template function In-Reply-To: Reply-To: gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org From: "hubicka at gcc dot gnu dot org" Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org X-SW-Source: 2010-01/txt/msg01186.txt.bz2 ------- Comment #17 from hubicka at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-01-10 23:42 ------- Well, since we want to make more similar changes in foreseeable future, I would prefer to see ipa-sra enabled in 4.5 and problems fixed. It is excercising quite new type of transformations. In general I am not sure plan of doing all datastructure/function call conventions changes via clonning is coolest idea. These transforms tends to be quite busy so we would need to do a lot of copying. Usual top-down inliner should not look into future of topological order anyway. While current implementation of incremental inlining can theoretically bring in nonoptimized bodies too, I am not sure it is good idea. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42336