public inbox for gcc-bugs@sourceware.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "carrot at google dot com" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug target/40730] redundant memory load
Date: Mon, 11 Jan 2010 08:56:00 -0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20100111085553.32223.qmail@sourceware.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <bug-40730-17659@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>



------- Comment #12 from carrot at google dot com  2010-01-11 08:55 -------
(In reply to comment #11)
> Yes, I would have expected the block starting with .L4 to be *after*
> the block starting with .L5, something like so:
> 
> iterate:
>         push    {lr}
>         ldr     r3, [r1]
> .L6:
>         str     r3, [r0]
>         sub     r2, r3, #0
>         beq     .L3
> .L5:
>         ldr     r1, [r3, #4]
>         cmp     r1, #0
>         bne     .L3
>         ldr     r3, [r3, #8]
>         b       .L6
> .L3:
>         str     r2, [r0, #12]
>         @ sp needed for prologue
>         pop     {pc}
> 
> Does that look correct?  And if so, could you see if there is an open
> bug report about this; or otherwise file a new PR and add me to the
> CC-list?
> 

It is correct. The basic block ordering issue (-Os) has been observed several
times. Following are related PRs:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41004
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41396


-- 


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40730


  parent reply	other threads:[~2010-01-11  8:56 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2009-07-13  8:57 [Bug target/40730] New: " carrot at google dot com
2009-07-13  8:58 ` [Bug target/40730] " carrot at google dot com
2009-07-13  9:51 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
2009-07-13 10:10 ` steven at gcc dot gnu dot org
2009-07-14  9:14 ` carrot at google dot com
2009-07-14  9:18 ` steven at gcc dot gnu dot org
2009-07-14  9:20 ` steven at gcc dot gnu dot org
2009-07-15  8:07 ` carrot at google dot com
2009-07-15  9:47 ` steven at gcc dot gnu dot org
2010-01-08  9:34 ` steven at gcc dot gnu dot org
2010-01-11  6:47 ` carrot at google dot com
2010-01-11  8:23 ` stevenb dot gcc at gmail dot com
2010-01-11  8:56 ` carrot at google dot com [this message]
     [not found] <bug-40730-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
2023-05-15  0:10 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
2023-05-15  0:24 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20100111085553.32223.qmail@sourceware.org \
    --to=gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org \
    --cc=gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).