public inbox for gcc-bugs@sourceware.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug fortran/42684] [4.5 Regression] ICE when interface operator(xx) available through host and use assoc in module procedure
Date: Wed, 13 Jan 2010 04:23:00 -0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20100113042333.18688.qmail@sourceware.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <bug-42684-17837@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
------- Comment #6 from jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-01-13 04:23 -------
Regression testing with the following patch passes. I used p->sym->name
instead of q->sym->name in place of NULL, but I do not think it matters.
Index: interface.c
===================================================================
--- interface.c (revision 155799)
+++ interface.c (working copy)
@@ -1126,7 +1126,7 @@
if (p->sym->name == q->sym->name && p->sym->module == q->sym->module)
continue;
- if (gfc_compare_interfaces (p->sym, q->sym, NULL, generic_flag, 0,
+ if (gfc_compare_interfaces (p->sym, q->sym, p->sym->name, generic_flag,
0,
NULL, 0))
{
if (referenced)
and allows operator.f90 to compile as well as the test case in PR42680.
I think this does it. I will submit to list for approval.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42684
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-01-13 4:23 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-01-10 23:19 [Bug fortran/42684] New: " ian_harvey at bigpond dot com
2010-01-10 23:21 ` [Bug fortran/42684] " ian_harvey at bigpond dot com
2010-01-11 1:56 ` ian_harvey at bigpond dot com
2010-01-11 2:54 ` jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org
2010-01-11 8:32 ` [Bug fortran/42684] [4.5 Regression] " burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org
2010-01-11 8:50 ` dominiq at lps dot ens dot fr
2010-01-13 3:14 ` jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org
2010-01-13 4:23 ` jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org [this message]
2010-01-13 4:24 ` jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org
2010-01-14 3:07 ` jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org
2010-01-14 16:39 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
2010-01-15 1:48 ` jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org
2010-01-15 2:06 ` jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org
2010-01-15 2:07 ` jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org
2010-02-07 4:47 ` hjl at gcc dot gnu dot org
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20100113042333.18688.qmail@sourceware.org \
--to=gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org \
--cc=gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).