From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 21332 invoked by alias); 15 Jan 2010 03:26:41 -0000 Received: (qmail 21257 invoked by uid 48); 15 Jan 2010 03:26:29 -0000 Date: Fri, 15 Jan 2010 03:26:00 -0000 Message-ID: <20100115032629.21256.qmail@sourceware.org> X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC References: Subject: [Bug tree-optimization/39251] FAIL: g++.dg/tree-ssa/new1.C scan-tree-dump-not forwprop1 "= .* \+ -" In-Reply-To: Reply-To: gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org From: "mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org" Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org X-SW-Source: 2010-01/txt/msg01822.txt.bz2 ------- Comment #8 from mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-01-15 03:26 ------- Ramana -- If I'm reading the log correctly for PR36633 the change that Jason made there didn't actually fix the bug; it was just a cleanup. He commented that something else had changed which made the bug go away. However, if this is behaving different on ARM from (say) x86, I think that the ABI is a likely cause because, as you say, the C++ ABI for these bits is subtly different. Do we know that this is ARM-specific? Thanks, -- Mark -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39251