From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 13908 invoked by alias); 22 Jan 2010 14:52:44 -0000 Received: (qmail 13827 invoked by alias); 22 Jan 2010 14:52:25 -0000 Date: Fri, 22 Jan 2010 14:52:00 -0000 Message-ID: <20100122145225.13826.qmail@sourceware.org> X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC References: Subject: [Bug middle-end/42068] [4.5 regression] ICE in function_and_variable_visibility with static common vars. In-Reply-To: Reply-To: gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org From: "hubicka at ucw dot cz" Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org X-SW-Source: 2010-01/txt/msg02741.txt.bz2 ------- Comment #33 from hubicka at ucw dot cz 2010-01-22 14:52 ------- Subject: Re: [4.5 regression] ICE in function_and_variable_visibility with static common vars. > I'm not sure what Jan is asking for exactly, but in an attempt to be helpful > here is a traceback using the 20091124 sources for the reduced testcase on > alpha-openvms. The debugging info is messed up for me too, but its just the > source line correlation records numbers, the call stack looks reasonable. If I > can be of further assistance please ask. The backtrace should be definitely enough. What I need is trace of the setfault reported in comment #19. It should happen on mainline with the proposed patch (attached in the PR) minus changes to Ada directory (that already was commited to mainline in modified form) applied. There is still bug in handling user defined comdat functions, so I would like to debug rest of the patch for mainline. Thanks, Honza -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42068