From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 12244 invoked by alias); 27 Jan 2010 08:51:50 -0000 Received: (qmail 12187 invoked by uid 48); 27 Jan 2010 08:51:40 -0000 Date: Wed, 27 Jan 2010 08:51:00 -0000 Message-ID: <20100127085140.12186.qmail@sourceware.org> X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC References: Subject: [Bug middle-end/42874] [4.5 Regression] Error on correct code: sorry, unimplemented: function ‘foo’ can never be copied because it uses In-Reply-To: Reply-To: gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org From: "jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org" Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org X-SW-Source: 2010-01/txt/msg03022.txt.bz2 ------- Comment #4 from jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-01-27 08:51 ------- Seems the hack not to inline such functions (but until 4.4 always_inline won over it) has been added for PR6994, which has been fixed in a different way anyway. And obviously we are now copying/remapping stuff containing VLAs, e.g. omp-low.c does that. So I'd say we should just nuke that restriction. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42874