From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 12962 invoked by alias); 27 Jan 2010 15:43:25 -0000 Received: (qmail 12894 invoked by uid 48); 27 Jan 2010 15:43:07 -0000 Date: Wed, 27 Jan 2010 15:43:00 -0000 Message-ID: <20100127154307.12893.qmail@sourceware.org> X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC References: Subject: [Bug c/42884] GCC (v4.3.3) fails to detect uninitialized variable In-Reply-To: Reply-To: gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org From: "tstdenis at elliptictech dot com" Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org X-SW-Source: 2010-01/txt/msg03097.txt.bz2 ------- Comment #9 from tstdenis at elliptictech dot com 2010-01-27 15:43 ------- (In reply to comment #8) > Is 'coverity' a compiler? I don't think so. Do you have actual examples of > *compilers* which, everything taken into account, decided to make sure this > case is worth warning? I wonder if there is an "apathy" reason to close bugs.... ho hum... I'm just saying that it is something that should at some point be addressed. Maybe not today, maybe not tomorrow, but soon, and for the rest of the projects life cycle. -- tstdenis at elliptictech dot com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Version|4.3.3 |unknown http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42884