[Bug c++/42859] [4.5 regression] ICE in verify_flow_info

[Bug c++/42859] [4.5 regression] ICE in verify_flow_info

[jojelino at gmail dot com]

------- Comment #1 from jojelino at gmail dot com  2010-01-25 00:11 -------
Created an attachment (id=19698)
 --> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=19698&action=view)
testcase


-- 


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42859

[Bug c++/42859] New: [4.5 regression] ICE in verify_flow_info

[jojelino at gmail dot com]

[-- Warning: decoded text below may be mangled, UTF-8 assumed --]
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 3430 bytes --]

Using built-in specs.
COLLECT_GCC=g++
COLLECT_LTO_WRAPPER=/usr/libexec/gcc/i686-pc-cygwin/4.5.0/lto-wrapper.exe
Target: i686-pc-cygwin
Configured with: ./configure --prefix=/usr --disable-win32-registry
--enable-threads=posix --enable-languages=c,c++,java
--with-win32-nlsapi=unicode --enable-tls --disable-bootstrap --enable-shared
--enable-interpreter --disable-sjlj-exceptions --enable-load-library
--enable-java-awt=gtk
Thread model: posix
gcc version 4.5.0 20100120 (experimental) (GCC) 
COLLECT_GCC_OPTIONS='-nostdinc' '-v' '-shared-libgcc' '-mtune=generic'
 /usr/libexec/gcc/i686-pc-cygwin/4.5.0/cc1plus.exe -fpreprocessed pthread.ii
-quiet -dumpbase pthread.ii -mtune=generic -auxbase pthread -version -o
/cygdrive/d/Temp/cache/ccycFNGG.s
GNU C++ (GCC) version 4.5.0 20100120 (experimental) (i686-pc-cygwin)
        compiled by GNU C version 4.5.0 20100119 (experimental), GMP version
4.3.1, MPFR version 2.4.1-p5, MPC version 0.8
GGC heuristics: --param ggc-min-expand=30 --param ggc-min-heapsize=4096
GNU C++ (GCC) version 4.5.0 20100120 (experimental) (i686-pc-cygwin)
        compiled by GNU C version 4.5.0 20100119 (experimental), GMP version
4.3.1, MPFR version 2.4.1-p5, MPC version 0.8
GGC heuristics: --param ggc-min-expand=30 --param ggc-min-heapsize=4096
Compiler executable checksum: 797829d91662cb6a9eac7b21dd4c8ffc
In file included from private.c:48:0,
                 from pthread.c:44:
ptw32_threadStart.c: In function ¡®unsigned int ptw32_threadStart(void*)¡¯:
ptw32_threadStart.c:256:45: warning: exception of type ¡®ptw32_exception¡¯ will
be caught
ptw32_threadStart.c:256:7: warning:    by earlier handler for
¡®ptw32_exception¡¯
ptw32_threadStart.c:263:7: warning: exception of type ¡®ptw32_exception¡¯ will
be caught
ptw32_threadStart.c:256:45: warning:    by earlier handler for
¡®ptw32_exception¡¯
ptw32_threadStart.c:286:41: warning: exception of type
¡®ptw32_exception_cancel¡¯ will be caught
ptw32_threadStart.c:286:3: warning:    by earlier handler for
¡®ptw32_exception¡¯
ptw32_threadStart.c:293:41: warning: exception of type ¡®ptw32_exception_exit¡¯
will be caught
ptw32_threadStart.c:293:3: warning:    by earlier handler for
¡®ptw32_exception¡¯
In file included from private.c:48:0,
                 from pthread.c:44:
ptw32_threadStart.c:125:1: error: case labels not sorted: 
case 1: is greater than case 1: but comes before it.
ptw32_threadStart.c:125:1: error: case labels not sorted: 
case 1: is greater than case 1: but comes before it.
ptw32_threadStart.c:125:1: error: case labels not sorted: 
case 1: is greater than case 1: but comes before it.
ptw32_threadStart.c:125:1: error: case labels not sorted: 
case 1: is greater than case 1: but comes before it.
ptw32_threadStart.c:125:1: internal compiler error: verify_flow_info failed
Please submit a full bug report,
with preprocessed source if appropriate.
See <http://gcc.gnu.org/bugs.html> for instructions.


-- 
           Summary: [4.5 regression] ICE in verify_flow_info
           Product: gcc
           Version: 4.5.0
            Status: UNCONFIRMED
          Severity: normal
          Priority: P3
         Component: c++
        AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org
        ReportedBy: jojelino at gmail dot com
 GCC build triplet: i686-pc-cygwin
  GCC host triplet: i686-pc-cygwin
GCC target triplet: i686-pc-cygwin


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42859

[Bug c++/42859] [4.5 regression] ICE in verify_flow_info

[jojelino at gmail dot com]

------- Comment #2 from jojelino at gmail dot com  2010-01-25 00:23 -------
Created an attachment (id=19699)
 --> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=19699&action=view)
testcase

other testcase


-- 


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42859

[Bug middle-end/42859] [4.5 regression] ICE in verify_flow_info

[rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org]

------- Comment #3 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org  2010-01-25 09:56 -------
Confirmed.  Reducing.


-- 

rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|UNCONFIRMED                 |NEW
     Ever Confirmed|0                           |1
   Last reconfirmed|0000-00-00 00:00:00         |2010-01-25 09:56:22
               date|                            |
   Target Milestone|---                         |4.5.0


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42859

[Bug middle-end/42859] [4.5 regression] ICE in verify_flow_info

[rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org]

------- Comment #4 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org  2010-01-25 10:06 -------
I suppose this is from rths exception rewrite.

void start (void);
void ptw32_terminate (void)
{
  try {
      start ();
  }
  catch( int ) { }
  catch( int ) { }
}


-- 

rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 CC|                            |rth at gcc dot gnu dot org
           Priority|P3                          |P1


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42859

[Bug middle-end/42859] [4.5 regression] ICE in verify_flow_info

[steven at gcc dot gnu dot org]

------- Comment #5 from steven at gcc dot gnu dot org  2010-01-27 22:09 -------
Compiled the test case of comment #4 with:
"./cc1plus PR42859.ii -fdump-tree-all-all"


The dump PR42859.ii.040t.release_ssa:

void ptw32_terminate() ()
Eh tree:
   3 cleanup
   2 cleanup
   1 try land:{1,<L1>} catch:{lab:<L2>;int},{lab:<L3>;int}
{
  intD.2 D.1713;
  intD.2 D.1708;
  voidD.35 * D.1719;
  voidD.35 * D.1718;
  register intD.2 * D.1714;
  voidD.35 * D.1717;
  voidD.35 * D.1716;
  register intD.2 * D.1711;

  # BLOCK 2
  # PRED: ENTRY (fallthru)
  [LP 1] startD.1705 ();
  # SUCC: 4 (eh) 3 (fallthru)

  # BLOCK 3
  # PRED: 2 (fallthru) 6 (fallthru) 7 (fallthru)
  return;
  # SUCC: EXIT

  # BLOCK 4
  # PRED: 2 (eh)
<L1>: [LP 1]
  eh_dispatch 1
  # SUCC: 6 7 5 (fallthru)

  # BLOCK 5
  # PRED: 4 (fallthru)
  resx 1
  # SUCC:

  # BLOCK 6
  # PRED: 4
<L2>:
  D.1716_1 = __builtin_eh_pointerD.1627 (1);
  D.1717_2 = __cxa_begin_catchD.1710 (D.1716_1);
  D.1711_3 = (intD.2 *) D.1717_2;
  D.1708_4 = *D.1711_3;
  __cxa_end_catchD.1709 ();
  goto <bb 3>;
  # SUCC: 3 (fallthru)

  # BLOCK 7
  # PRED: 4
<L3>:
  D.1718_5 = __builtin_eh_pointerD.1627 (1);
  D.1719_6 = __cxa_begin_catchD.1710 (D.1718_5);
  D.1714_7 = (intD.2 *) D.1719_6;
  D.1713_8 = *D.1714_7;
  __cxa_end_catchD.1709 ();
  goto <bb 3>;
  # SUCC: 3 (fallthru)

}



This gets lowered like so according to the dump PR42859.ii.055t.ehdisp:

void ptw32_terminate() ()
Eh tree:
   3 cleanup
   2 cleanup
   1 try land:{1,<L1>} catch:{int},{int}
{
  intD.2 D.1727;
  intD.2 D.1713;
  intD.2 D.1708;
  voidD.35 * D.1719;
  voidD.35 * D.1718;
  register intD.2 * D.1714;
  voidD.35 * D.1717; 
  voidD.35 * D.1716;
  register intD.2 * D.1711;

  # BLOCK 2 
  # PRED: ENTRY (fallthru)
  [LP 1] startD.1705 ();
  # SUCC: 4 (eh) 3 (fallthru)

  # BLOCK 3 
  # PRED: 2 (fallthru) 6 (fallthru) 7 (fallthru)
  return;
  # SUCC: EXIT

  # BLOCK 4
  # PRED: 2 (eh)
<L1>: [LP 1]
  D.1727_9 = __builtin_eh_filterD.1628 (1);
  switch (D.1727_9) <default: <L4>, case 1: <L2>, case 1: <L3>>
  # SUCC: 6 7 5

  # BLOCK 5
  # PRED: 4
<L4>:
  resx 1
  # SUCC:

  # BLOCK 6
  # PRED: 4
<L2>:
  D.1716_1 = __builtin_eh_pointerD.1627 (1);
  D.1717_2 = __cxa_begin_catchD.1710 (D.1716_1);
  D.1711_3 = (intD.2 *) D.1717_2;
  D.1708_4 = *D.1711_3;
  __cxa_end_catchD.1709 ();
  goto <bb 3>;
  # SUCC: 3 (fallthru)

  # BLOCK 7
  # PRED: 4
<L3>:
  D.1718_5 = __builtin_eh_pointerD.1627 (1);
  D.1719_6 = __cxa_begin_catchD.1710 (D.1718_5);
  D.1714_7 = (intD.2 *) D.1719_6;
  D.1713_8 = *D.1714_7;
  __cxa_end_catchD.1709 ();
  goto <bb 3>;
  # SUCC: 3 (fallthru)

}


Note the duplicate "case 1" label in "switch (D.1727_9) <default: <L4>, case 1:
<L2>, case 1: <L3>>" in basic block 4.


-- 


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42859

[Bug middle-end/42859] [4.5 regression] ICE in verify_flow_info

[abel at gcc dot gnu dot org]

------- Comment #6 from abel at gcc dot gnu dot org  2010-02-16 15:43 -------
How about the below patch?  It fixes all testcases for me.  I'm not sure
whether it makes sense to filter duplicate labels this late, but I don't know
how to do this earlier, as catches seem to be lowering independently of each
other.

diff --git a/gcc/tree-eh.c b/gcc/tree-eh.c
index 2cb334f..c18b807 100644
--- a/gcc/tree-eh.c
+++ b/gcc/tree-eh.c
@@ -28,6 +28,7 @@ along with GCC; see the file COPYING3.  If not see
 #include "flags.h"
 #include "function.h"
 #include "except.h"
+#include "pointer-set.h"
 #include "tree-flow.h"
 #include "tree-dump.h"
 #include "tree-inline.h"
@@ -3063,6 +3064,7 @@ lower_eh_dispatch (basic_block src, gimple stmt)
        eh_catch c;
        edge_iterator ei;
        edge e;
+       struct pointer_set_t *seen_values = pointer_set_create ();

        /* Collect the labels for a switch.  Zero the post_landing_pad
           field becase we'll no longer have anything keeping these labels
@@ -3071,6 +3073,7 @@ lower_eh_dispatch (basic_block src, gimple stmt)
        for (c = r->u.eh_try.first_catch; c ; c = c->next_catch)
          {
            tree tp_node, flt_node, lab = c->label;
+           bool have_label = false;

            c->label = NULL;
            tp_node = c->type_list;
@@ -3083,14 +3086,26 @@ lower_eh_dispatch (basic_block src, gimple stmt)
              }
            do
              {
-               tree t = build3 (CASE_LABEL_EXPR, void_type_node,
-                                TREE_VALUE (flt_node), NULL, lab);
-               VEC_safe_push (tree, heap, labels, t);
+               /* Filter out duplicate labels that arise when this handler 
+                  is shadowed by an earlier one.  When no labels are 
+                  attached to the handler anymore, we remove 
+                  the corresponding edge and then we delete unreachable 
+                  blocks at the end of this pass.  */
+               if (! pointer_set_contains (seen_values, TREE_VALUE
(flt_node)))
+                 {
+                   tree t = build3 (CASE_LABEL_EXPR, void_type_node,
+                                    TREE_VALUE (flt_node), NULL, lab);
+                   VEC_safe_push (tree, heap, labels, t);
+                   pointer_set_insert (seen_values, TREE_VALUE (flt_node));
+                   have_label = true;
+                 }

                tp_node = TREE_CHAIN (tp_node);
                flt_node = TREE_CHAIN (flt_node);
              }
            while (tp_node);
+           if (! have_label)
+             remove_edge (find_edge (src, label_to_block (lab)));
          }

        /* Clean up the edge flags.  */
@@ -3132,6 +3147,7 @@ lower_eh_dispatch (basic_block src, gimple stmt)

            VEC_free (tree, heap, labels);
          }
+       pointer_set_destroy (seen_values);
       }
       break;

@@ -3185,6 +3201,8 @@ execute_lower_eh_dispatch (void)
        }
     }

+  if (any_rewritten)
+    delete_unreachable_blocks ();
   return any_rewritten ? TODO_update_ssa_only_virtuals : 0;
 }



-- 

abel at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 CC|                            |abel at gcc dot gnu dot org


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42859

[Bug middle-end/42859] [4.5 regression] ICE in verify_flow_info

[rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org]

------- Comment #7 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org  2010-02-22 10:54 -------
(In reply to comment #6)
> How about the below patch?  It fixes all testcases for me.  I'm not sure
> whether it makes sense to filter duplicate labels this late, but I don't know
> how to do this earlier, as catches seem to be lowering independently of each
> other.

Looks sensible, though unreachable block removal should be conditional on
us removing an edge, not on lowering anything.

> diff --git a/gcc/tree-eh.c b/gcc/tree-eh.c
> index 2cb334f..c18b807 100644
> --- a/gcc/tree-eh.c
> +++ b/gcc/tree-eh.c
> @@ -28,6 +28,7 @@ along with GCC; see the file COPYING3.  If not see
>  #include "flags.h"
>  #include "function.h"
>  #include "except.h"
> +#include "pointer-set.h"
>  #include "tree-flow.h"
>  #include "tree-dump.h"
>  #include "tree-inline.h"
> @@ -3063,6 +3064,7 @@ lower_eh_dispatch (basic_block src, gimple stmt)
>         eh_catch c;
>         edge_iterator ei;
>         edge e;
> +       struct pointer_set_t *seen_values = pointer_set_create ();
> 
>         /* Collect the labels for a switch.  Zero the post_landing_pad
>            field becase we'll no longer have anything keeping these labels
> @@ -3071,6 +3073,7 @@ lower_eh_dispatch (basic_block src, gimple stmt)
>         for (c = r->u.eh_try.first_catch; c ; c = c->next_catch)
>           {
>             tree tp_node, flt_node, lab = c->label;
> +           bool have_label = false;
> 
>             c->label = NULL;
>             tp_node = c->type_list;
> @@ -3083,14 +3086,26 @@ lower_eh_dispatch (basic_block src, gimple stmt)
>               }
>             do
>               {
> -               tree t = build3 (CASE_LABEL_EXPR, void_type_node,
> -                                TREE_VALUE (flt_node), NULL, lab);
> -               VEC_safe_push (tree, heap, labels, t);
> +               /* Filter out duplicate labels that arise when this handler 
> +                  is shadowed by an earlier one.  When no labels are 
> +                  attached to the handler anymore, we remove 
> +                  the corresponding edge and then we delete unreachable 
> +                  blocks at the end of this pass.  */
> +               if (! pointer_set_contains (seen_values, TREE_VALUE
> (flt_node)))
> +                 {
> +                   tree t = build3 (CASE_LABEL_EXPR, void_type_node,
> +                                    TREE_VALUE (flt_node), NULL, lab);
> +                   VEC_safe_push (tree, heap, labels, t);
> +                   pointer_set_insert (seen_values, TREE_VALUE (flt_node));
> +                   have_label = true;
> +                 }
> 
>                 tp_node = TREE_CHAIN (tp_node);
>                 flt_node = TREE_CHAIN (flt_node);
>               }
>             while (tp_node);
> +           if (! have_label)
> +             remove_edge (find_edge (src, label_to_block (lab)));
>           }
> 
>         /* Clean up the edge flags.  */
> @@ -3132,6 +3147,7 @@ lower_eh_dispatch (basic_block src, gimple stmt)
> 
>             VEC_free (tree, heap, labels);
>           }
> +       pointer_set_destroy (seen_values);
>        }
>        break;
> 
> @@ -3185,6 +3201,8 @@ execute_lower_eh_dispatch (void)
>         }
>      }
> 
> +  if (any_rewritten)
> +    delete_unreachable_blocks ();
>    return any_rewritten ? TODO_update_ssa_only_virtuals : 0;
>  }
> 
> 


-- 


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42859

[Bug middle-end/42859] [4.5 regression] ICE in verify_flow_info

[abel at gcc dot gnu dot org]

------- Comment #8 from abel at gcc dot gnu dot org  2010-02-22 20:10 -------
(In reply to comment #7)
> Looks sensible, though unreachable block removal should be conditional on
> us removing an edge, not on lowering anything.
Sure, I'd just make lower_eh_dispatch return a boolean for this and repost to
gcc-patches.


-- 


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42859

[Bug middle-end/42859] [4.5 regression] ICE in verify_flow_info

[abel at gcc dot gnu dot org]

------- Comment #9 from abel at gcc dot gnu dot org  2010-02-24 15:58 -------
Created an attachment (id=19949)
 --> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=19949&action=view)
patch

Here is the updated patch, it bootstraps and regtests fine on x86-64 linux. 
I'm leaving for about a week starting tomorrow, so no post to gcc-patches now,
sorry.


-- 


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42859

[Bug middle-end/42859] [4.5 regression] ICE in verify_flow_info

[abel at gcc dot gnu dot org]

------- Comment #10 from abel at gcc dot gnu dot org  2010-03-10 11:09 -------
Subject: Bug 42859

Author: abel
Date: Wed Mar 10 11:08:48 2010
New Revision: 157337

URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=157337
Log:
    PR middle-end/42859

    * tree-eh.c: Include pointer-set.h.
    (lower_eh_dispatch): Filter out duplicate case labels and
    remove the unneeded edge when the label is unused.  Return
    true when some edges are removed.
    (execute_lower_eh_dispatch): When any lowering resulted in
    removing an edge, also delete unreachable blocks.

    * g++.dg/eh/pr42859.C: New test. 

Added:
    trunk/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/eh/pr42859.C
Modified:
    trunk/gcc/ChangeLog
    trunk/gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog
    trunk/gcc/tree-eh.c


-- 


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42859

[Bug middle-end/42859] [4.5 regression] ICE in verify_flow_info

[abel at gcc dot gnu dot org]

------- Comment #11 from abel at gcc dot gnu dot org  2010-03-10 11:09 -------
Fixed.


-- 

abel at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|NEW                         |RESOLVED
         Resolution|                            |FIXED


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42859

[Bug middle-end/42859] [4.5 regression] ICE in verify_flow_info

[hjl at gcc dot gnu dot org]

------- Comment #12 from hjl at gcc dot gnu dot org  2010-03-13 16:59 -------
Subject: Bug 42859

Author: hjl
Date: Sat Mar 13 16:58:19 2010
New Revision: 157426

URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=157426
Log:
Backport testcases from mainline.

2010-03-13  H.J. Lu  <hongjiu.lu@intel.com>

        Backport from mainline:
        2010-03-11  Martin Jambor  <mjambor@suse.cz>

        PR tree-optimization/43257
        * g++.dg/torture/pr43257.C: New test.

        2010-03-11  Richard Guenther  <rguenther@suse.de>

        PR tree-optimization/43255
        * gcc.c-torture/compile/pr43255.c: New testcase.

        2010-03-11  Andreas Krebbel  <Andreas.Krebbel@de.ibm.com>

        * gcc.dg/pr43280.c: New testcase.

        2010-03-10  Jan Hubicka   <jh@suse.cz>

        * gcc.c-torture/compile/pr43288.c: New test.

        2010-03-10  Andrey Belevantsev  <abel@ispras.ru>

        PR middle-end/42859
        * g++.dg/eh/pr42859.C: New test.

        2010-03-09  Jakub Jelinek  <jakub@redhat.com>

        PR debug/43299
        * gcc.dg/pr43299.c: New test.

        2010-03-08  Richard Guenther  <rguenther@suse.de>

        PR tree-optimization/43269
        * gcc.c-torture/execute/pr43269.c: New testcase.

        2010-03-04  Martin Jambor  <mjambor@suse.cz>

        PR tree-optimization/43164
        PR tree-optimization/43191
        * gcc.c-torture/compile/pr43164.c: New test.
        * gcc.c-torture/compile/pr43191.c: Likewise.

        2010-03-04  Changpeng Fang  <changpeng.fang@amd.com>

        PR middle-end/43209
        * gcc.dg/tree-ssa/ivopts-4.c: New.

        2010-03-03  Jakub Jelinek  <jakub@redhat.com>

        PR debug/43229
        * gfortran.dg/pr43229.f90: New test.

        PR debug/43237
        * gcc.dg/debug/dwarf2/pr43237.c: New test.

        2010-03-02  Paul Thomas  <pault@gcc.gnu.org>

        PR fortran/43180
        * gfortran.dg/internal_pack_10.f90: New test.

        2010-02-26  Richard Guenther  <rguenther@suse.de>

        PR tree-optimization/43188
        * gcc.c-torture/compile/pr43188.c: New testcase.

        2010-02-25  Jakub Jelinek  <jakub@redhat.com>

        PR debug/43166
        * gfortran.dg/debug/pr43166.f: New test.

        PR debug/43165
        * gcc.dg/torture/pr43165.c: New test.

        2010-02-23  Jakub Jelinek  <jakub@redhat.com>

        PR target/43107
        * gcc.target/i386/pr43107.c: New test.

Added:
    branches/gcc-4_4-branch/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/eh/pr42859.C
      - copied unchanged from r157425, trunk/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/eh/pr42859.C
    branches/gcc-4_4-branch/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/torture/pr43257.C
      - copied unchanged from r157425,
trunk/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/torture/pr43257.C
    branches/gcc-4_4-branch/gcc/testsuite/gcc.c-torture/compile/pr43164.c
      - copied unchanged from r157425,
trunk/gcc/testsuite/gcc.c-torture/compile/pr43164.c
    branches/gcc-4_4-branch/gcc/testsuite/gcc.c-torture/compile/pr43188.c
      - copied unchanged from r157425,
trunk/gcc/testsuite/gcc.c-torture/compile/pr43188.c
    branches/gcc-4_4-branch/gcc/testsuite/gcc.c-torture/compile/pr43191.c
      - copied unchanged from r157425,
trunk/gcc/testsuite/gcc.c-torture/compile/pr43191.c
    branches/gcc-4_4-branch/gcc/testsuite/gcc.c-torture/compile/pr43255.c
      - copied unchanged from r157425,
trunk/gcc/testsuite/gcc.c-torture/compile/pr43255.c
    branches/gcc-4_4-branch/gcc/testsuite/gcc.c-torture/compile/pr43288.c
      - copied unchanged from r157425,
trunk/gcc/testsuite/gcc.c-torture/compile/pr43288.c
    branches/gcc-4_4-branch/gcc/testsuite/gcc.c-torture/execute/pr43269.c
      - copied unchanged from r157425,
trunk/gcc/testsuite/gcc.c-torture/execute/pr43269.c
    branches/gcc-4_4-branch/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/debug/dwarf2/pr43237.c
      - copied unchanged from r157425,
trunk/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/debug/dwarf2/pr43237.c
    branches/gcc-4_4-branch/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/pr43280.c
      - copied unchanged from r157425, trunk/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/pr43280.c
    branches/gcc-4_4-branch/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/pr43299.c
      - copied unchanged from r157425, trunk/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/pr43299.c
    branches/gcc-4_4-branch/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/torture/pr43165.c
      - copied unchanged from r157425,
trunk/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/torture/pr43165.c
    branches/gcc-4_4-branch/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/tree-ssa/ivopts-4.c
      - copied unchanged from r157425,
trunk/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/tree-ssa/ivopts-4.c
    branches/gcc-4_4-branch/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/i386/pr43107.c
      - copied unchanged from r157425,
trunk/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/i386/pr43107.c
    branches/gcc-4_4-branch/gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/debug/pr43166.f
      - copied unchanged from r157425,
trunk/gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/debug/pr43166.f
    branches/gcc-4_4-branch/gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/internal_pack_10.f90
      - copied unchanged from r157425,
trunk/gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/internal_pack_10.f90
    branches/gcc-4_4-branch/gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/pr43229.f90
      - copied unchanged from r157425,
trunk/gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/pr43229.f90
Modified:
    branches/gcc-4_4-branch/gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog


-- 


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42859