From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 19039 invoked by alias); 1 Feb 2010 09:21:42 -0000 Received: (qmail 18937 invoked by alias); 1 Feb 2010 09:21:25 -0000 Date: Mon, 01 Feb 2010 09:21:00 -0000 Message-ID: <20100201092125.18936.qmail@sourceware.org> X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC References: Subject: [Bug fortran/42900] gfortran.dg/stat_[12].f90 may fail on NFS filesystems In-Reply-To: Reply-To: gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org From: "ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld dot DE" Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org X-SW-Source: 2010-02/txt/msg00016.txt.bz2 ------- Comment #2 from ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld dot DE 2010-02-01 09:21 ------- Subject: Re: gfortran.dg/stat_[12].f90 may fail on NFS filesystems > ------- Comment #1 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-01-29 22:35 ------- > I'd say add a comment to the testcase and WONTFIX. I don't think this is a good idea: this part of the testcase tests a condition that doesn't necessarily hold, and is outside the control of the testsuite. I'd rather remove that part of the test than have this confusing noise in many reports. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42900