public inbox for gcc-bugs@sourceware.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [Bug fortran/42650] New: F90: DT function with in-line DT definition and RESULT is rejected
@ 2010-01-07 16:49 burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org
2010-01-08 5:48 ` [Bug fortran/42650] " pault at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (5 more replies)
0 siblings, 6 replies; 7+ messages in thread
From: burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2010-01-07 16:49 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
The one of following valid Fortran 90 functions is rejected: While the first
function "func" works and has function name = result name, the second
("func2"), which uses RESULT(), is rejected with the error message:
Error: The type for function 'func2' at (1) is not accessible
type(t) function func()
type t
sequence
integer :: i = 5
end type t
end function func
type(t) function func2() result(res)
type t
sequence
integer :: i = 5
end type t
end function func2
--
Summary: F90: DT function with in-line DT definition and RESULT
is rejected
Product: gcc
Version: 4.5.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: rejects-valid
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: fortran
AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org
ReportedBy: burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org
OtherBugsDependingO 32834
nThis:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42650
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
* [Bug fortran/42650] F90: DT function with in-line DT definition and RESULT is rejected
2010-01-07 16:49 [Bug fortran/42650] New: F90: DT function with in-line DT definition and RESULT is rejected burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2010-01-08 5:48 ` pault at gcc dot gnu dot org
2010-02-01 22:17 ` burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (4 subsequent siblings)
5 siblings, 0 replies; 7+ messages in thread
From: pault at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2010-01-08 5:48 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Comment #1 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-01-08 05:47 -------
type(t) function func2() result(res)
type t
sequence
integer :: i = 5
end type t
res%i = 2
end function func2
causes a segmentation fault!
Confirmed
Paul
--
pault at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Ever Confirmed|0 |1
Last reconfirmed|0000-00-00 00:00:00 |2010-01-08 05:47:58
date| |
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42650
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
* [Bug fortran/42650] F90: DT function with in-line DT definition and RESULT is rejected
2010-01-07 16:49 [Bug fortran/42650] New: F90: DT function with in-line DT definition and RESULT is rejected burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org
2010-01-08 5:48 ` [Bug fortran/42650] " pault at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2010-02-01 22:17 ` burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org
2010-02-01 22:46 ` burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (3 subsequent siblings)
5 siblings, 0 replies; 7+ messages in thread
From: burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2010-02-01 22:17 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Comment #2 from burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-02-01 22:16 -------
The problem is somehow that for the second parsing using decl.c's
gfc_match_decl_type_spec one has in:
else if (ts->kind == -1)
{
int iface = gfc_state_stack->previous->state != COMP_INTERFACE
|| gfc_current_ns->has_import_set;
if (gfc_find_symbol (name, NULL, iface, &sym))
{
gfc_error ("Type name '%s' at %C is ambiguous", name);
return MATCH_ERROR;
}
the result sym == NULL with RESULT() but not without RESULT(); while
"iface==1" and name == "t" for both cases.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42650
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
* [Bug fortran/42650] F90: DT function with in-line DT definition and RESULT is rejected
2010-01-07 16:49 [Bug fortran/42650] New: F90: DT function with in-line DT definition and RESULT is rejected burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org
2010-01-08 5:48 ` [Bug fortran/42650] " pault at gcc dot gnu dot org
2010-02-01 22:17 ` burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2010-02-01 22:46 ` burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org
2010-02-02 13:06 ` burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (2 subsequent siblings)
5 siblings, 0 replies; 7+ messages in thread
From: burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2010-02-01 22:46 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Comment #3 from burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-02-01 22:46 -------
Patch:
Index: gcc/fortran/parse.c
===================================================================
--- gcc/fortran/parse.c (Revision 156433)
+++ gcc/fortran/parse.c
@@ -111,7 +111,7 @@ decode_specification_statement (void)
match ("import", gfc_match_import, ST_IMPORT);
match ("use", gfc_match_use, ST_USE);
- if (gfc_current_block ()->ts.type != BT_DERIVED)
+ if (gfc_current_block ()->result->ts.type != BT_DERIVED)
goto end_of_block;
match (NULL, gfc_match_st_function, ST_STATEMENT_FUNCTION);
--
burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
AssignedTo|unassigned at gcc dot gnu |burnus at gcc dot gnu dot
|dot org |org
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed|2010-01-08 05:47:58 |2010-02-01 22:46:13
date| |
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42650
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
* [Bug fortran/42650] F90: DT function with in-line DT definition and RESULT is rejected
2010-01-07 16:49 [Bug fortran/42650] New: F90: DT function with in-line DT definition and RESULT is rejected burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (2 preceding siblings ...)
2010-02-01 22:46 ` burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2010-02-02 13:06 ` burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org
2010-02-02 14:27 ` burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org
2010-02-02 14:28 ` burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org
5 siblings, 0 replies; 7+ messages in thread
From: burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2010-02-02 13:06 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Comment #4 from burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-02-02 13:06 -------
Subject: Bug 42650
Author: burnus
Date: Tue Feb 2 13:05:50 2010
New Revision: 156449
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=156449
Log:
2010-02-02 Tobias Burnus <burnus@net-b.de>
PR fortran/42650
* parse.c (decode_specification_statement): Use sym->result not
* sym.
2010-02-02 Tobias Burnus <burnus@net-b.de>
PR fortran/42650
* gfortran.dg/func_result_5.f90: New test.
Added:
trunk/gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/func_result_5.f90
Modified:
trunk/gcc/fortran/ChangeLog
trunk/gcc/fortran/parse.c
trunk/gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42650
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
* [Bug fortran/42650] F90: DT function with in-line DT definition and RESULT is rejected
2010-01-07 16:49 [Bug fortran/42650] New: F90: DT function with in-line DT definition and RESULT is rejected burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (3 preceding siblings ...)
2010-02-02 13:06 ` burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2010-02-02 14:27 ` burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org
2010-02-02 14:28 ` burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org
5 siblings, 0 replies; 7+ messages in thread
From: burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2010-02-02 14:27 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Comment #5 from burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-02-02 14:27 -------
Subject: Bug 42650
Author: burnus
Date: Tue Feb 2 14:27:24 2010
New Revision: 156450
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=156450
Log:
2010-02-02 Tobias Burnus <burnus@net-b.de>
PR fortran/42650
* parse.c (decode_specification_statement): Use sym->result not
* sym.
2010-02-02 Tobias Burnus <burnus@net-b.de>
PR fortran/42650
* gfortran.dg/func_result_5.f90: New test.
Added:
branches/gcc-4_4-branch/gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/func_result_5.f90
Modified:
branches/gcc-4_4-branch/gcc/fortran/ChangeLog
branches/gcc-4_4-branch/gcc/fortran/parse.c
branches/gcc-4_4-branch/gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42650
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
* [Bug fortran/42650] F90: DT function with in-line DT definition and RESULT is rejected
2010-01-07 16:49 [Bug fortran/42650] New: F90: DT function with in-line DT definition and RESULT is rejected burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (4 preceding siblings ...)
2010-02-02 14:27 ` burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2010-02-02 14:28 ` burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org
5 siblings, 0 replies; 7+ messages in thread
From: burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2010-02-02 14:28 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Comment #6 from burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-02-02 14:27 -------
FIXED on the trunk (4.5) and 4.4 branch.
--
burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|ASSIGNED |RESOLVED
Resolution| |FIXED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42650
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2010-02-02 14:28 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2010-01-07 16:49 [Bug fortran/42650] New: F90: DT function with in-line DT definition and RESULT is rejected burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org
2010-01-08 5:48 ` [Bug fortran/42650] " pault at gcc dot gnu dot org
2010-02-01 22:17 ` burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org
2010-02-01 22:46 ` burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org
2010-02-02 13:06 ` burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org
2010-02-02 14:27 ` burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org
2010-02-02 14:28 ` burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).