From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 12732 invoked by alias); 5 Feb 2010 12:46:08 -0000 Received: (qmail 12663 invoked by uid 48); 5 Feb 2010 12:45:53 -0000 Date: Fri, 05 Feb 2010 12:46:00 -0000 Message-ID: <20100205124553.12662.qmail@sourceware.org> X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC References: Subject: [Bug middle-end/42972] Very bad bit field code In-Reply-To: Reply-To: gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org From: "steven at gcc dot gnu dot org" Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org X-SW-Source: 2010-02/txt/msg00370.txt.bz2 ------- Comment #2 from steven at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-02-05 12:45 ------- This is both a tree-optimization and an rtl-optimization problem, so setting component to "middle-end" (there is no generic "optimization" component anymore). -- steven at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Component|tree-optimization |middle-end Ever Confirmed|0 |1 Last reconfirmed|0000-00-00 00:00:00 |2010-02-05 12:45:53 date| | http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42972