From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 4477 invoked by alias); 8 Feb 2010 15:01:43 -0000 Received: (qmail 1629 invoked by uid 48); 8 Feb 2010 15:01:29 -0000 Date: Mon, 08 Feb 2010 15:01:00 -0000 Message-ID: <20100208150129.1628.qmail@sourceware.org> X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC References: Subject: [Bug fortran/42999] [4.5 Regression] bogus error: Parameter 'i' at (1) has not been declared or is a variable, which does not reduce to a constant expression In-Reply-To: Reply-To: gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org From: "burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org" Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org X-SW-Source: 2010-02/txt/msg00730.txt.bz2 ------- Comment #1 from burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-02-08 15:01 ------- I think it regressed between 2010-01-07-r155688 and 2010-01-10-r155780 Jerry, I think that is due to your initializer patch: r155769 | jvdelisle | 2010-01-09 18:47:04 +0100 (Sat, 09 Jan 2010) | 18 lines http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=155769 2010-01-09 Jerry DeLisle PR fortran/20923 PR fortran/32489 [...] * resolve.c (gfc_is_expandable_expr): New function that determiners if array expressions should have their constructors expanded. (gfc_resolve_expr): Use new function to determine whether or not to call gfc_expand_constructor. -- burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot | |org Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Ever Confirmed|0 |1 Last reconfirmed|0000-00-00 00:00:00 |2010-02-08 15:01:28 date| | http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42999