From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 18123 invoked by alias); 8 Feb 2010 15:18:54 -0000 Received: (qmail 18068 invoked by uid 48); 8 Feb 2010 15:18:44 -0000 Date: Mon, 08 Feb 2010 15:18:00 -0000 Message-ID: <20100208151844.18067.qmail@sourceware.org> X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC References: Subject: [Bug c++/42983] [C++0x] Defaulted virtual destructor isn't virtual In-Reply-To: Reply-To: gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org From: "lavock at gmail dot com" Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org X-SW-Source: 2010-02/txt/msg00733.txt.bz2 ------- Comment #17 from lavock at gmail dot com 2010-02-08 15:18 ------- (In reply to comment #16) > Yes, but you're using an experimental implementation of an incomplete > specification. Using it for serious code would be foolish, so I tend to agree > it's low priority Yes, i agree with low priority, but maybe don't mark available for this feature, since it seems to be partially available. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42983