From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 26284 invoked by alias); 8 Feb 2010 15:28:00 -0000 Received: (qmail 26246 invoked by uid 48); 8 Feb 2010 15:27:47 -0000 Date: Mon, 08 Feb 2010 15:28:00 -0000 Message-ID: <20100208152747.26245.qmail@sourceware.org> X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC References: Subject: [Bug c++/42983] [C++0x] Defaulted virtual destructor isn't virtual In-Reply-To: Reply-To: gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org From: "paolo dot carlini at oracle dot com" Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org X-SW-Source: 2010-02/txt/msg00734.txt.bz2 ------- Comment #18 from paolo dot carlini at oracle dot com 2010-02-08 15:27 ------- It is available, for sure. We are talking about trying to use the feature in a case where the code is actually ill-formed, per a DR which is in the [Ready] status, that is, a very advanced status, but still not fully resolved, not in WP yet. It's just a little more than a purely diagnostic issue. By the way, you bet, if you start fiddling very hard, you will find ill-formed code getting through in *much* older areas, not having anything to do with C++1x, very basic parts of C++98, yes. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42983