public inbox for gcc-bugs@sourceware.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "dberlin at dberlin dot org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug web/43011] Upgrade gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla to Bugzilla 3.4.5
Date: Thu, 11 Feb 2010 20:45:00 -0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20100211204456.30146.qmail@sourceware.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <bug-43011-18765@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
[-- Warning: decoded text below may be mangled, UTF-8 assumed --]
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1244 bytes --]
------- Comment #19 from dberlin at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-02-11 20:44 -------
Subject: Re: Upgrade gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla to Bugzilla 3.4.5
It has the security patch ;)
None of this would have been a big deal if it hadn't taken bugzilla 10
years to decide on custom fields ;)
THe main changes in both bugzilla is to remove the opsys/platform
fields and add our triplet fields.
On Thu, Feb 11, 2010 at 3:23 PM, LpSolit at netscape dot net
<gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org> wrote:
>
>
> ------- Comment #18 from LpSolit at netscape dot net 2010-02-11 20:23 -------
> (In reply to comment #17)
>> It would be really great if someone would update the sourceware.org
>> bugzilla at the same time, so we could run a single version on the machine.
>
> Wow, http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/ runs Bugzilla 2.17.5, a development
> snapshot which was released in November 2003 and which got replaced the week
> after by 2.17.6 because it had a security hole. You guys like to live
> dangerously. :)
>
>
> --
>
>
> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43011
>
> ------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
> You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.
>
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43011
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-02-11 20:45 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 55+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-02-09 19:51 [Bug web/43011] New: " LpSolit at netscape dot net
2010-02-09 19:54 ` [Bug web/43011] " pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
2010-02-09 19:58 ` LpSolit at netscape dot net
2010-02-09 20:18 ` joseph at codesourcery dot com
2010-02-09 20:22 ` LpSolit at netscape dot net
2010-02-09 20:34 ` joseph at codesourcery dot com
2010-02-09 20:46 ` LpSolit at netscape dot net
2010-02-09 21:02 ` jsm28 at gcc dot gnu dot org
2010-02-09 21:09 ` jsm28 at gcc dot gnu dot org
2010-02-09 21:15 ` joseph at codesourcery dot com
2010-02-09 21:44 ` LpSolit at netscape dot net
2010-02-09 21:46 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
2010-02-09 22:11 ` LpSolit at netscape dot net
2010-02-10 0:21 ` joseph at codesourcery dot com
2010-02-10 0:29 ` LpSolit at netscape dot net
2010-02-10 2:29 ` joseph at codesourcery dot com
2010-02-10 19:48 ` LpSolit at netscape dot net
2010-02-11 20:18 ` tromey at gcc dot gnu dot org
2010-02-11 20:24 ` LpSolit at netscape dot net
2010-02-11 20:45 ` dberlin at dberlin dot org [this message]
2010-02-11 20:58 ` LpSolit at netscape dot net
2010-02-11 21:03 ` LpSolit at netscape dot net
2010-02-11 21:05 ` tromey at gcc dot gnu dot org
2010-02-11 21:08 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
2010-02-11 21:08 ` LpSolit at netscape dot net
2010-03-30 9:54 ` [Bug web/43011] Upgrade gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla to Bugzilla 3.6 LpSolit at netscape dot net
2010-03-30 23:18 ` dberlin at dberlin dot org
2010-05-27 23:26 ` nightstrike at gmail dot com
2010-07-15 23:04 ` LpSolit at netscape dot net
2010-07-19 12:00 ` dberlin at dberlin dot org
2010-08-09 22:21 ` LpSolit at netscape dot net
2010-09-07 15:00 ` LpSolit at netscape dot net
2010-09-07 15:51 ` tromey at gcc dot gnu dot org
2010-09-07 16:16 ` gerald at pfeifer dot com
2010-09-07 16:23 ` LpSolit at netscape dot net
2010-09-07 17:58 ` tom dot browder at gmail dot com
2010-09-07 18:11 ` LpSolit at netscape dot net
2010-09-07 18:17 ` fche at redhat dot com
2010-09-07 21:38 ` fche at redhat dot com
2010-09-07 22:50 ` dberlin at dberlin dot org
2010-09-07 22:54 ` LpSolit at netscape dot net
2010-09-08 21:36 ` LpSolit at netscape dot net
2010-09-09 22:43 ` LpSolit at netscape dot net
2010-09-10 9:34 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
2010-09-10 9:58 ` jv244 at cam dot ac dot uk
2010-09-10 10:29 ` burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org
2010-09-10 10:34 ` LpSolit at netscape dot net
2010-09-10 10:46 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org
2010-09-12 20:24 ` LpSolit at netscape dot net
2010-09-15 21:17 ` LpSolit at netscape dot net
2010-09-16 22:51 ` LpSolit at netscape dot net
2010-09-20 21:43 ` LpSolit at netscape dot net
2010-09-20 21:47 ` LpSolit at netscape dot net
2010-09-22 20:16 ` LpSolit at netscape dot net
2010-09-22 20:18 ` LpSolit at netscape dot net
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20100211204456.30146.qmail@sourceware.org \
--to=gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org \
--cc=gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).