From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 31969 invoked by alias); 12 Feb 2010 15:45:34 -0000 Received: (qmail 31914 invoked by uid 48); 12 Feb 2010 15:45:20 -0000 Date: Fri, 12 Feb 2010 15:45:00 -0000 Message-ID: <20100212154520.31913.qmail@sourceware.org> X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC References: Subject: [Bug c/43052] Inline memcmp is *much* slower than glibc's In-Reply-To: Reply-To: gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org From: "amonakov at gcc dot gnu dot org" Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org X-SW-Source: 2010-02/txt/msg01181.txt.bz2 ------- Comment #1 from amonakov at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-02-12 15:45 ------- Confirmed. GCC simply emits repz cmpsb. There was even an e-mail with benchmark results and a patch (never applied): http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2009-09/msg02129.html -- amonakov at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Ever Confirmed|0 |1 Last reconfirmed|0000-00-00 00:00:00 |2010-02-12 15:45:19 date| | http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43052