From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 30232 invoked by alias); 15 Feb 2010 08:18:09 -0000 Received: (qmail 30151 invoked by uid 48); 15 Feb 2010 08:17:57 -0000 Date: Mon, 15 Feb 2010 08:18:00 -0000 Message-ID: <20100215081757.30150.qmail@sourceware.org> X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC References: Subject: [Bug fortran/43062] NAMELIST attribute conflicts with ALLOCATABLE attribute In-Reply-To: Reply-To: gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org From: "zazzou at gmail dot com" Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org X-SW-Source: 2010-02/txt/msg01381.txt.bz2 ------- Comment #4 from zazzou at gmail dot com 2010-02-15 08:17 ------- (In reply to comment #3) > I've posted a question to c.l.f about this code. I > believe the language of the standard is contradictory > and as such the code can be interpreted as illegal or > legal. > > http://groups.google.com/group/comp.lang.fortran/browse_frm/thread/76b23c9927b52161# > Into the final committee draft J3/03-007R2, section 5.4, I found : C574 (R553) A namelist-group-object shall not be an assumed-size array. It was not the case in F95. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43062