From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 29200 invoked by alias); 19 Feb 2010 12:29:55 -0000 Received: (qmail 29141 invoked by uid 48); 19 Feb 2010 12:29:43 -0000 Date: Fri, 19 Feb 2010 12:29:00 -0000 Message-ID: <20100219122943.29140.qmail@sourceware.org> X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC References: Subject: [Bug tree-optimization/38785] [4.3/4.4/4.5 Regression] huge performance regression on EEMBC bitmnp01 In-Reply-To: Reply-To: gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org From: "amylaar at gcc dot gnu dot org" Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org X-SW-Source: 2010-02/txt/msg01929.txt.bz2 ------- Comment #22 from amylaar at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-02-19 12:29 ------- (In reply to comment #21) > The patch would need updating now. Micha, does your tracer handle this case? See comment #20 for an updated patch. However, I don't have EEMBC available at the moment to make absolutely sure that the original problem is still addressed. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38785