public inbox for gcc-bugs@sourceware.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [Bug c++/33801] Missing warning
[not found] <bug-33801-16141@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
@ 2010-02-21 1:07 ` manu at gcc dot gnu dot org
2010-02-21 1:28 ` bangerth at gmail dot com
` (2 subsequent siblings)
3 siblings, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: manu at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2010-02-21 1:07 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Comment #1 from manu at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-02-21 01:06 -------
What does EDG say? What is the problem? This bug summary is too vague.
--
manu at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33801
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* [Bug c++/33801] Missing warning
[not found] <bug-33801-16141@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
2010-02-21 1:07 ` [Bug c++/33801] Missing warning manu at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2010-02-21 1:28 ` bangerth at gmail dot com
2010-07-06 17:34 ` manu at gcc dot gnu dot org
2010-07-06 18:18 ` paolo dot carlini at oracle dot com
3 siblings, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: bangerth at gmail dot com @ 2010-02-21 1:28 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Comment #2 from bangerth at gmail dot com 2010-02-21 01:27 -------
I don't see what should be warned about. The 'const' in the signature of
'f' has no effect here, but it also doesn't hurt -- its presence or
absence simply doesn't make a difference.
W.
--
bangerth at gmail dot com changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |bangerth at gmail dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33801
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* [Bug c++/33801] Missing warning
[not found] <bug-33801-16141@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
2010-02-21 1:07 ` [Bug c++/33801] Missing warning manu at gcc dot gnu dot org
2010-02-21 1:28 ` bangerth at gmail dot com
@ 2010-07-06 17:34 ` manu at gcc dot gnu dot org
2010-07-06 18:18 ` paolo dot carlini at oracle dot com
3 siblings, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: manu at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2010-07-06 17:34 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Comment #3 from manu at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-07-06 17:34 -------
3 years in waiting... I am closing this, we have too many real bugs open to
worry about.
--
manu at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|WAITING |RESOLVED
Resolution| |WONTFIX
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33801
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* [Bug c++/33801] Missing warning
[not found] <bug-33801-16141@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
` (2 preceding siblings ...)
2010-07-06 17:34 ` manu at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2010-07-06 18:18 ` paolo dot carlini at oracle dot com
3 siblings, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: paolo dot carlini at oracle dot com @ 2010-07-06 18:18 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Comment #4 from paolo dot carlini at oracle dot com 2010-07-06 18:18 -------
Sorry about the delay. The warning emitted by current ICC by default is
exactly:
33801.C(10): warning #21: type qualifiers are meaningless in this declaration
f(const typename C::const_reference value)
^
detected during instantiation of class "iter<C> [with C=cont]" at
line 16
Likewise VC++, for example. Let's keep this open for a while.
--
paolo dot carlini at oracle dot com changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|RESOLVED |UNCONFIRMED
Resolution|WONTFIX |
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33801
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* [Bug c++/33801] Missing warning
2007-10-17 17:37 [Bug c++/33801] New: " pcarlini at suse dot de
@ 2007-10-17 17:37 ` pcarlini at suse dot de
0 siblings, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: pcarlini at suse dot de @ 2007-10-17 17:37 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
--
pcarlini at suse dot de changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Severity|normal |enhancement
Keywords| |diagnostic
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33801
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2010-07-06 18:18 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
[not found] <bug-33801-16141@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
2010-02-21 1:07 ` [Bug c++/33801] Missing warning manu at gcc dot gnu dot org
2010-02-21 1:28 ` bangerth at gmail dot com
2010-07-06 17:34 ` manu at gcc dot gnu dot org
2010-07-06 18:18 ` paolo dot carlini at oracle dot com
2007-10-17 17:37 [Bug c++/33801] New: " pcarlini at suse dot de
2007-10-17 17:37 ` [Bug c++/33801] " pcarlini at suse dot de
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).