From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 1490 invoked by alias); 21 Feb 2010 17:25:36 -0000 Received: (qmail 936 invoked by uid 48); 21 Feb 2010 17:25:23 -0000 Date: Sun, 21 Feb 2010 17:25:00 -0000 Message-ID: <20100221172523.935.qmail@sourceware.org> X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC References: Subject: [Bug c/43128] [4.5 Regression] c-c++-common/pr41779.c doesn't work In-Reply-To: Reply-To: gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org From: "manu at gcc dot gnu dot org" Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org X-SW-Source: 2010-02/txt/msg02164.txt.bz2 ------- Comment #11 from manu at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-02-21 17:25 ------- I may have miscompared the bootstrap results to miss this because I do test -m32. Yes, the excess precision stuff changes the common type to long double in build_binary_op in C and -m32 (but not in C++!). Joseph, is this the correct thing to do or a latent bug? -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43128