From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 666 invoked by alias); 21 Feb 2010 17:57:39 -0000 Received: (qmail 503 invoked by uid 48); 21 Feb 2010 17:57:27 -0000 Date: Sun, 21 Feb 2010 17:57:00 -0000 Message-ID: <20100221175727.502.qmail@sourceware.org> X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC References: Subject: [Bug c/43128] [4.5 Regression] c-c++-common/pr41779.c doesn't work In-Reply-To: Reply-To: gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org From: "manu at gcc dot gnu dot org" Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org X-SW-Source: 2010-02/txt/msg02167.txt.bz2 ------- Comment #13 from manu at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-02-21 17:57 ------- (In reply to comment #12) > Subject: Re: [4.5 Regression] c-c++-common/pr41779.c doesn't > work Sorry I do not understand completely your answer. Shouldn't we warn at all? If the semantics were implemented as intended, should we warn? Also, the casting to long double seems to be introduced by the float, not by the integer, if I debugged the code correctly. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43128