From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-309416-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: (qmail 3411 invoked by alias); 21 Feb 2010 18:00:59 -0000
Received: (qmail 3287 invoked by uid 48); 21 Feb 2010 18:00:47 -0000
Date: Sun, 21 Feb 2010 18:00:00 -0000
Message-ID: <20100221180047.3286.qmail@sourceware.org>
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
References: <bug-43128-682@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Subject: [Bug c/43128] [4.5 Regression] c-c++-common/pr41779.c doesn't work
In-Reply-To: <bug-43128-682@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Reply-To: gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
From: "hjl dot tools at gmail dot com" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
X-SW-Source: 2010-02/txt/msg02168.txt.bz2



------- Comment #14 from hjl dot tools at gmail dot com  2010-02-21 18:00 -------
That is true that the previous release didn't have proper excess
precision semantics. But from the user perspective, the previous
release handles

--
float f5(float x, int y)
{
  return x * y;
}
--

correctly with "-Wconversion -std=c99". For this particular testcase,
gcc 4.5 has a user visible regression.


-- 


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43128