From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 32155 invoked by alias); 21 Feb 2010 18:16:09 -0000 Received: (qmail 32000 invoked by alias); 21 Feb 2010 18:15:57 -0000 Date: Sun, 21 Feb 2010 18:16:00 -0000 Message-ID: <20100221181557.31999.qmail@sourceware.org> X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC References: Subject: [Bug c/43128] [4.5 Regression] c-c++-common/pr41779.c doesn't work In-Reply-To: Reply-To: gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org From: "joseph at codesourcery dot com" Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org X-SW-Source: 2010-02/txt/msg02171.txt.bz2 ------- Comment #15 from joseph at codesourcery dot com 2010-02-21 18:15 ------- Subject: Re: [4.5 Regression] c-c++-common/pr41779.c doesn't work On Sun, 21 Feb 2010, manu at gcc dot gnu dot org wrote: > Sorry I do not understand completely your answer. Shouldn't we warn at all? If > the semantics were implemented as intended, should we warn? With the intended semantics, we should warn; there would be an actual conversion from integer to float there, that could change the value. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43128