From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 4489 invoked by alias); 24 Feb 2010 16:28:37 -0000 Received: (qmail 4299 invoked by uid 48); 24 Feb 2010 16:28:19 -0000 Date: Wed, 24 Feb 2010 16:28:00 -0000 Message-ID: <20100224162819.4298.qmail@sourceware.org> X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC References: Subject: [Bug other/43132] installation directory defaults do not match documentation, Coding Standards In-Reply-To: Reply-To: gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org From: "mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org" Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org X-SW-Source: 2010-02/txt/msg02475.txt.bz2 ------- Comment #6 from mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-02-24 16:28 ------- Ralf -- I think the key question here is whether it is possible to build/install a new version of GCC, getting the same directory layout as was the default in previous versions. It's OK if it takes command-line options, but I think it should be *possible*. If not, then I think it is a regression. Do you know the answer? Thanks, -- Mark -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43132