public inbox for gcc-bugs@sourceware.org help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "dominiq at lps dot ens dot fr" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org> To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug middle-end/40106] [4.4/4.5 Regression] Weird interaction between optimize_insn_for_speed_p and -funsafe-math-optimizations Date: Thu, 25 Feb 2010 17:20:00 -0000 [thread overview] Message-ID: <20100225172014.32306.qmail@sourceware.org> (raw) In-Reply-To: <bug-40106-12313@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/> ------- Comment #35 from dominiq at lps dot ens dot fr 2010-02-25 17:20 ------- I changed the summary to reflect the status of this pr (see comment #31). I think the following questions should be answered: (a) why optimize_insn_for_speed_p is changed by the options -funsafe-math-optimizations and -fno-strict-overflow? (b) why !optimize_size (lines 2929 and 2953 of http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs/branches/gcc-4_3-branch/gcc/builtins.c?revision=151052&view=markup&sortby=file last 4.3 revision) has been replaced with optimize_insn_for_speed_p () (lines 2961 and 2985 of http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs/branches/gcc-4_4-branch/gcc/builtins.c?revision=145122&view=markup&sortby=file first 4.4 revision)? Side question, is there anybody really convinced that replacing pow(a,b) with powi(a,n) when b==n is not always a win even for -Os? Note that the replacement for x**(n/3) * cbrt(x)**(n%3) does not seems guarded by any optimisation flag. -- dominiq at lps dot ens dot fr changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Summary|[4.4/4.5 Regression] Time |[4.4/4.5 Regression] Weird |increase for the Polyhedron |interaction between |test air.f90 due to bad |optimize_insn_for_speed_p |optimization |and -funsafe-math- | |optimizations http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40106
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-02-25 17:20 UTC|newest] Thread overview: 64+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top 2009-05-11 18:04 [Bug middle-end/40106] New: Time increase with inlining for the Polyhedron test air.f90 dominiq at lps dot ens dot fr 2009-05-12 11:52 ` [Bug middle-end/40106] " hubicka at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-05-12 13:23 ` dominiq at lps dot ens dot fr 2009-05-12 14:47 ` rguenther at suse dot de 2009-05-12 16:18 ` dominiq at lps dot ens dot fr 2009-05-22 20:39 ` dominiq at lps dot ens dot fr 2009-05-22 20:41 ` dominiq at lps dot ens dot fr 2009-05-22 20:52 ` dominiq at lps dot ens dot fr 2009-07-13 15:29 ` burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-08-25 11:56 ` dominiq at lps dot ens dot fr 2009-08-25 12:01 ` [Bug middle-end/40106] Time increase " dominiq at lps dot ens dot fr 2009-08-25 12:22 ` [Bug middle-end/40106] Time increase with inlining " rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-08-25 12:30 ` dominiq at lps dot ens dot fr 2009-08-25 12:40 ` rguenther at suse dot de 2009-08-25 12:51 ` dominiq at lps dot ens dot fr 2009-08-25 15:31 ` dominiq at lps dot ens dot fr 2009-08-25 21:25 ` [Bug middle-end/40106] Time increase for the Polyhedron test air.f90 due to bad optimization dominiq at lps dot ens dot fr 2009-08-27 21:59 ` dominiq at lps dot ens dot fr 2009-08-28 1:09 ` howarth at nitro dot med dot uc dot edu 2009-08-28 5:39 ` dominiq at lps dot ens dot fr 2009-08-28 7:19 ` dominiq at lps dot ens dot fr 2009-08-28 12:01 ` dominiq at lps dot ens dot fr 2009-08-28 12:23 ` dominiq at lps dot ens dot fr 2009-08-28 13:36 ` howarth at nitro dot med dot uc dot edu 2009-08-31 13:06 ` dominiq at lps dot ens dot fr 2009-08-31 15:04 ` dominiq at lps dot ens dot fr 2009-08-31 15:21 ` jv244 at cam dot ac dot uk 2009-08-31 15:23 ` rguenther at suse dot de 2009-08-31 23:59 ` dominiq at lps dot ens dot fr 2009-09-01 9:37 ` dominiq at lps dot ens dot fr 2009-09-03 7:10 ` [Bug middle-end/40106] [4.4/4.5 Regression] " dominiq at lps dot ens dot fr 2009-09-03 11:20 ` dominiq at lps dot ens dot fr 2009-09-06 22:15 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-09-18 8:58 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-10-15 12:49 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-10-18 13:22 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-12-15 16:40 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-01-21 13:16 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-02-25 17:20 ` dominiq at lps dot ens dot fr [this message] 2010-03-16 15:07 ` [Bug middle-end/40106] [4.4/4.5 Regression] Weird interaction between optimize_insn_for_speed_p and -funsafe-math-optimizations dominiq at lps dot ens dot fr 2010-03-16 15:11 ` rguenther at suse dot de 2010-03-16 15:26 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-03-16 15:50 ` dominiq at lps dot ens dot fr 2010-03-16 15:52 ` rguenther at suse dot de 2010-03-16 16:04 ` dominiq at lps dot ens dot fr 2010-03-16 16:07 ` rguenther at suse dot de 2010-03-16 16:39 ` dominiq at lps dot ens dot fr 2010-03-16 16:59 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-03-16 17:14 ` dominiq at lps dot ens dot fr 2010-03-18 18:30 ` dominiq at lps dot ens dot fr 2010-03-19 10:26 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-03-19 10:35 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-03-19 15:40 ` dominiq at lps dot ens dot fr 2010-03-20 13:03 ` dominiq at lps dot ens dot fr 2010-03-20 13:21 ` dominiq at lps dot ens dot fr 2010-03-20 14:19 ` rguenther at suse dot de 2010-03-20 14:40 ` dominiq at lps dot ens dot fr 2010-03-20 15:00 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-03-20 15:12 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-03-22 10:36 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-03-22 12:38 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-03-22 12:39 ` [Bug middle-end/40106] [4.4 " rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-03-25 17:38 ` hubicka at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-04-30 9:01 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org
Reply instructions: You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email using any one of the following methods: * Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client, and reply-to-all from there: mbox Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style * Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to switches of git-send-email(1): git send-email \ --in-reply-to=20100225172014.32306.qmail@sourceware.org \ --to=gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org \ --cc=gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org \ /path/to/YOUR_REPLY https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html * If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header via mailto: links, try the mailto: linkBe sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox; as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).