public inbox for gcc-bugs@sourceware.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [Bug tree-optimization/43220] New: Paritially optimized __builtin_save_stack/__builtin_restore_stack causes segmentation fault
@ 2010-03-01 14:07 bmei at broadcom dot com
2010-03-01 15:00 ` [Bug tree-optimization/43220] [4.3/4.4/4.5 Regression] " rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (7 more replies)
0 siblings, 8 replies; 9+ messages in thread
From: bmei at broadcom dot com @ 2010-03-01 14:07 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
I encountered a segmentation fault when executing an unrolled version of
20040811-1.c (tested with -O2)
void *volatile p;
int
main (void)
{
int n = 0;
lab:;
{
int x[n % 1000 + 1];
x[0] = 1;
x[n % 1000] = 2;
p = x;
n++;
}
{
int x[n % 1000 + 1];
x[0] = 1;
x[n % 1000] = 2;
p = x;
n++;
}
if (n < 1000000)
goto lab;
return 0;
}
The problem is that the first pair of
__builtin_stack_save/__builtin_satck_restore of the unrolled loop is optimized
out in optimize_stack_restore (tree-ssa-ccp.c) of fab pass. Consequently, the
dynamic memory allocated grows bigger and bigger and causes segfault. The
following is from tst.c.139t.optimized
lab:
saved_stack.1_3 = 0B;
D.2723_4 = n_1 % 1000;
D.2724_5 = D.2723_4 + 1;
D.2728_15 = (long unsigned int) D.2724_5;
D.2730_16 = D.2728_15 * 4;
D.2732_17 = __builtin_alloca (D.2730_16);
x.0_18 = (int[0:D.2727] *) D.2732_17;
(*x.0_18)[0] = 1;
(*x.0_18)[D.2723_4] = 2;
p ={v} x.0_18;
D.2770_66 = (unsigned int) n_1;
D.2771_65 = D.2770_66 + 1;
n_64 = (int) D.2771_65;
GIMPLE_NOP
saved_stack.3_21 = __builtin_stack_save ();
D.2723_22 = n_64 % 1000;
D.2734_23 = D.2723_22 + 1;
D.2738_33 = (long unsigned int) D.2734_23;
D.2740_34 = D.2738_33 * 4;
D.2742_35 = __builtin_alloca (D.2740_34);
x.2_36 = (int[0:D.2737] *) D.2742_35;
(*x.2_36)[0] = 1;
(*x.2_36)[D.2723_22] = 2;
p ={v} x.2_36;
D.2773_62 = D.2770_66 + 2;
n_61 = (int) D.2773_62;
__builtin_stack_restore (saved_stack.3_21);
if (n_61 != 1000000)
goto <bb 3> (lab);
else
goto <bb 4>;
--
Summary: Paritially optimized
__builtin_save_stack/__builtin_restore_stack causes
segmentation fault
Product: gcc
Version: 4.5.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: tree-optimization
AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org
ReportedBy: bmei at broadcom dot com
GCC target triplet: x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43220
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread
* [Bug tree-optimization/43220] [4.3/4.4/4.5 Regression] Paritially optimized __builtin_save_stack/__builtin_restore_stack causes segmentation fault
2010-03-01 14:07 [Bug tree-optimization/43220] New: Paritially optimized __builtin_save_stack/__builtin_restore_stack causes segmentation fault bmei at broadcom dot com
@ 2010-03-01 15:00 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
2010-03-01 15:16 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (6 subsequent siblings)
7 siblings, 0 replies; 9+ messages in thread
From: rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2010-03-01 15:00 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Comment #1 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-03-01 14:59 -------
Confirmed.
--
rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Ever Confirmed|0 |1
Keywords| |wrong-code
Known to fail| |4.3.4 4.4.3 4.5.0
Known to work| |4.2.4
Last reconfirmed|0000-00-00 00:00:00 |2010-03-01 14:59:56
date| |
Summary|Paritially optimized |[4.3/4.4/4.5 Regression]
|__builtin_save_stack/__built|Paritially optimized
|in_restore_stack causes |__builtin_save_stack/__built
|segmentation fault |in_restore_stack causes
| |segmentation fault
Target Milestone|--- |4.3.5
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43220
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread
* [Bug tree-optimization/43220] [4.3/4.4/4.5 Regression] Paritially optimized __builtin_save_stack/__builtin_restore_stack causes segmentation fault
2010-03-01 14:07 [Bug tree-optimization/43220] New: Paritially optimized __builtin_save_stack/__builtin_restore_stack causes segmentation fault bmei at broadcom dot com
2010-03-01 15:00 ` [Bug tree-optimization/43220] [4.3/4.4/4.5 Regression] " rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2010-03-01 15:16 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
2010-03-01 16:57 ` [Bug tree-optimization/43220] [4.3/4.4 " rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (5 subsequent siblings)
7 siblings, 0 replies; 9+ messages in thread
From: rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2010-03-01 15:16 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Comment #2 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-03-01 15:16 -------
The code doesn't do what it says it does. I have a patch.
--
rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
AssignedTo|unassigned at gcc dot gnu |rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot
|dot org |org
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed|2010-03-01 14:59:56 |2010-03-01 15:16:12
date| |
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43220
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread
* [Bug tree-optimization/43220] [4.3/4.4 Regression] Paritially optimized __builtin_save_stack/__builtin_restore_stack causes segmentation fault
2010-03-01 14:07 [Bug tree-optimization/43220] New: Paritially optimized __builtin_save_stack/__builtin_restore_stack causes segmentation fault bmei at broadcom dot com
2010-03-01 15:00 ` [Bug tree-optimization/43220] [4.3/4.4/4.5 Regression] " rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
2010-03-01 15:16 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2010-03-01 16:57 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
2010-03-01 16:57 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (4 subsequent siblings)
7 siblings, 0 replies; 9+ messages in thread
From: rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2010-03-01 16:57 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Comment #3 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-03-01 16:57 -------
Fixed for 4.5 sofar.
--
rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Known to fail|4.3.4 4.4.3 4.5.0 |4.3.4 4.4.3
Known to work|4.2.4 |4.2.4 4.5.0
Summary|[4.3/4.4/4.5 Regression] |[4.3/4.4 Regression]
|Paritially optimized |Paritially optimized
|__builtin_save_stack/__built|__builtin_save_stack/__built
|in_restore_stack causes |in_restore_stack causes
|segmentation fault |segmentation fault
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43220
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread
* [Bug tree-optimization/43220] [4.3/4.4 Regression] Paritially optimized __builtin_save_stack/__builtin_restore_stack causes segmentation fault
2010-03-01 14:07 [Bug tree-optimization/43220] New: Paritially optimized __builtin_save_stack/__builtin_restore_stack causes segmentation fault bmei at broadcom dot com
` (2 preceding siblings ...)
2010-03-01 16:57 ` [Bug tree-optimization/43220] [4.3/4.4 " rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2010-03-01 16:57 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
2010-03-02 7:44 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (3 subsequent siblings)
7 siblings, 0 replies; 9+ messages in thread
From: rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2010-03-01 16:57 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Comment #4 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-03-01 16:57 -------
Subject: Bug 43220
Author: rguenth
Date: Mon Mar 1 16:57:02 2010
New Revision: 157149
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=157149
Log:
2010-03-01 Richard Guenther <rguenther@suse.de>
PR tree-optimization/43220
* tree-ssa-ccp.c (optimize_stack_restore): Do not optimize
BUILT_IN_STACK_{SAVE,RESTORE} around alloca.
* gcc.c-torture/execute/pr43220.c: New testcase.
Added:
trunk/gcc/testsuite/gcc.c-torture/execute/pr43220.c
Modified:
trunk/gcc/ChangeLog
trunk/gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog
trunk/gcc/tree-ssa-ccp.c
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43220
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread
* [Bug tree-optimization/43220] [4.3/4.4 Regression] Paritially optimized __builtin_save_stack/__builtin_restore_stack causes segmentation fault
2010-03-01 14:07 [Bug tree-optimization/43220] New: Paritially optimized __builtin_save_stack/__builtin_restore_stack causes segmentation fault bmei at broadcom dot com
` (3 preceding siblings ...)
2010-03-01 16:57 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2010-03-02 7:44 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org
2010-03-02 7:47 ` [Bug tree-optimization/43220] [4.3 " jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (2 subsequent siblings)
7 siblings, 0 replies; 9+ messages in thread
From: jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2010-03-02 7:44 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Comment #5 from jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-03-02 07:44 -------
Subject: Bug 43220
Author: jakub
Date: Tue Mar 2 07:44:03 2010
New Revision: 157160
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=157160
Log:
Backport from mainline:
2010-03-01 Richard Guenther <rguenther@suse.de>
PR tree-optimization/43220
* tree-ssa-ccp.c (optimize_stack_restore): Do not optimize
BUILT_IN_STACK_{SAVE,RESTORE} around alloca.
* gcc.c-torture/execute/pr43220.c: New testcase.
Added:
branches/gcc-4_4-branch/gcc/testsuite/gcc.c-torture/execute/pr43220.c
Modified:
branches/gcc-4_4-branch/gcc/ChangeLog
branches/gcc-4_4-branch/gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog
branches/gcc-4_4-branch/gcc/tree-ssa-ccp.c
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43220
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread
* [Bug tree-optimization/43220] [4.3 Regression] Paritially optimized __builtin_save_stack/__builtin_restore_stack causes segmentation fault
2010-03-01 14:07 [Bug tree-optimization/43220] New: Paritially optimized __builtin_save_stack/__builtin_restore_stack causes segmentation fault bmei at broadcom dot com
` (4 preceding siblings ...)
2010-03-02 7:44 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2010-03-02 7:47 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org
2010-04-20 14:25 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
2010-04-20 14:25 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
7 siblings, 0 replies; 9+ messages in thread
From: jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2010-03-02 7:47 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Comment #6 from jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-03-02 07:47 -------
Fixed also on 4.4 branch.
--
jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Known to work|4.2.4 4.5.0 |4.2.4 4.4.4 4.5.0
Summary|[4.3/4.4 Regression] |[4.3 Regression] Paritially
|Paritially optimized |optimized
|__builtin_save_stack/__built|__builtin_save_stack/__built
|in_restore_stack causes |in_restore_stack causes
|segmentation fault |segmentation fault
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43220
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread
* [Bug tree-optimization/43220] [4.3 Regression] Paritially optimized __builtin_save_stack/__builtin_restore_stack causes segmentation fault
2010-03-01 14:07 [Bug tree-optimization/43220] New: Paritially optimized __builtin_save_stack/__builtin_restore_stack causes segmentation fault bmei at broadcom dot com
` (5 preceding siblings ...)
2010-03-02 7:47 ` [Bug tree-optimization/43220] [4.3 " jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2010-04-20 14:25 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
2010-04-20 14:25 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
7 siblings, 0 replies; 9+ messages in thread
From: rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2010-04-20 14:25 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Comment #8 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-04-20 14:25 -------
Subject: Bug 43220
Author: rguenth
Date: Tue Apr 20 14:24:39 2010
New Revision: 158561
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=158561
Log:
2010-04-20 Richard Guenther <rguenther@suse.de>
Backport from mainline:
2010-03-01 Richard Guenther <rguenther@suse.de>
PR tree-optimization/43220
* tree-ssa-ccp.c (optimize_stack_restore): Do not optimize
BUILT_IN_STACK_{SAVE,RESTORE} around alloca.
* gcc.c-torture/execute/pr43220.c: New testcase.
2008-12-03 Jakub Jelinek <jakub@redhat.com>
PR middle-end/38360
* tree-ssa-ccp.c (ccp_fold_builtin): Bail out if the builtin doesn't
have the right number of arguments.
* gcc.c-torture/compile/pr38360.c: New test.
Added:
branches/gcc-4_3-branch/gcc/testsuite/gcc.c-torture/compile/pr38360.c
branches/gcc-4_3-branch/gcc/testsuite/gcc.c-torture/execute/pr43220.c
Modified:
branches/gcc-4_3-branch/gcc/ChangeLog
branches/gcc-4_3-branch/gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog
branches/gcc-4_3-branch/gcc/tree-ssa-ccp.c
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43220
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread
* [Bug tree-optimization/43220] [4.3 Regression] Paritially optimized __builtin_save_stack/__builtin_restore_stack causes segmentation fault
2010-03-01 14:07 [Bug tree-optimization/43220] New: Paritially optimized __builtin_save_stack/__builtin_restore_stack causes segmentation fault bmei at broadcom dot com
` (6 preceding siblings ...)
2010-04-20 14:25 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2010-04-20 14:25 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
7 siblings, 0 replies; 9+ messages in thread
From: rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2010-04-20 14:25 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Comment #7 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-04-20 14:24 -------
Fixed.
--
rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|ASSIGNED |RESOLVED
Resolution| |FIXED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43220
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2010-04-20 14:25 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2010-03-01 14:07 [Bug tree-optimization/43220] New: Paritially optimized __builtin_save_stack/__builtin_restore_stack causes segmentation fault bmei at broadcom dot com
2010-03-01 15:00 ` [Bug tree-optimization/43220] [4.3/4.4/4.5 Regression] " rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
2010-03-01 15:16 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
2010-03-01 16:57 ` [Bug tree-optimization/43220] [4.3/4.4 " rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
2010-03-01 16:57 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
2010-03-02 7:44 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org
2010-03-02 7:47 ` [Bug tree-optimization/43220] [4.3 " jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org
2010-04-20 14:25 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
2010-04-20 14:25 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).