* [Bug libstdc++/43241] std::tr1::regex does not link
2010-03-03 0:17 [Bug libstdc++/43241] New: std::tr1::regex does not link pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2010-03-03 0:20 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
2010-03-03 0:21 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (6 subsequent siblings)
7 siblings, 0 replies; 9+ messages in thread
From: pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2010-03-03 0:20 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Comment #1 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-03-03 00:20 -------
Oh this change was on purpose:
r143125 | bkoz | 2009-01-06 09:41:02 -0800 (Tue, 06 Jan 2009) | 10 lines
2009-01-05 Benjamin Kosnik <bkoz@redhat.com>
* include/tr1_impl/regex: Remove unimplemented function definitions.
* testsuite/28_regex/init-list.cc: Compile only.
* testsuite/tr1/7_regular_expressions/regex/cons/char/
c_string_extended.cc: Same.
* testsuite/tr1/7_regular_expressions/basic_regex/assign/*: Same.
* testsuite/tr1/7_regular_expressions/basic_regex/ctors/*: Same.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43241
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread
* [Bug libstdc++/43241] std::tr1::regex does not link
2010-03-03 0:17 [Bug libstdc++/43241] New: std::tr1::regex does not link pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
2010-03-03 0:20 ` [Bug libstdc++/43241] " pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2010-03-03 0:21 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
2010-03-03 0:21 ` [Bug libstdc++/43241] std::tr1::regex is not fully implemented yet pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (5 subsequent siblings)
7 siblings, 0 replies; 9+ messages in thread
From: pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2010-03-03 0:21 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Comment #2 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-03-03 00:20 -------
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2009-01/msg00227.html for the patch itself.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43241
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread
* [Bug libstdc++/43241] std::tr1::regex is not fully implemented yet
2010-03-03 0:17 [Bug libstdc++/43241] New: std::tr1::regex does not link pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
2010-03-03 0:20 ` [Bug libstdc++/43241] " pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
2010-03-03 0:21 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2010-03-03 0:21 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
2010-03-03 1:16 ` paolo dot carlini at oracle dot com
` (4 subsequent siblings)
7 siblings, 0 replies; 9+ messages in thread
From: pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2010-03-03 0:21 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
--
pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Severity|normal |enhancement
Summary|std::tr1::regex does not |std::tr1::regex is not fully
|link |implemented yet
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43241
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread
* [Bug libstdc++/43241] std::tr1::regex is not fully implemented yet
2010-03-03 0:17 [Bug libstdc++/43241] New: std::tr1::regex does not link pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (2 preceding siblings ...)
2010-03-03 0:21 ` [Bug libstdc++/43241] std::tr1::regex is not fully implemented yet pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2010-03-03 1:16 ` paolo dot carlini at oracle dot com
2010-03-03 19:31 ` bangerth at gmail dot com
` (3 subsequent siblings)
7 siblings, 0 replies; 9+ messages in thread
From: paolo dot carlini at oracle dot com @ 2010-03-03 1:16 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Comment #3 from paolo dot carlini at oracle dot com 2010-03-03 01:16 -------
Yeah, this is not matter for a PR, a *lot* of work is needed for std::regex (at
this point nobody really cares about tr1::regex).
--
paolo dot carlini at oracle dot com changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution| |INVALID
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43241
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread
* [Bug libstdc++/43241] std::tr1::regex is not fully implemented yet
2010-03-03 0:17 [Bug libstdc++/43241] New: std::tr1::regex does not link pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (3 preceding siblings ...)
2010-03-03 1:16 ` paolo dot carlini at oracle dot com
@ 2010-03-03 19:31 ` bangerth at gmail dot com
2010-03-03 19:31 ` bangerth at gmail dot com
` (2 subsequent siblings)
7 siblings, 0 replies; 9+ messages in thread
From: bangerth at gmail dot com @ 2010-03-03 19:31 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Comment #4 from bangerth at gmail dot com 2010-03-03 19:30 -------
I think INVALID is the wrong resolution of this PR. This clearly is a bug
(if we offer a class we should make sure it can be used), but we may
choose to say that we won't work on this bug. The right resolution therefore...
--
bangerth at gmail dot com changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|RESOLVED |UNCONFIRMED
Resolution|INVALID |
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43241
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread
* [Bug libstdc++/43241] std::tr1::regex is not fully implemented yet
2010-03-03 0:17 [Bug libstdc++/43241] New: std::tr1::regex does not link pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (4 preceding siblings ...)
2010-03-03 19:31 ` bangerth at gmail dot com
@ 2010-03-03 19:31 ` bangerth at gmail dot com
2010-03-03 20:11 ` paolo dot carlini at oracle dot com
2010-03-03 20:14 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
7 siblings, 0 replies; 9+ messages in thread
From: bangerth at gmail dot com @ 2010-03-03 19:31 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Comment #5 from bangerth at gmail dot com 2010-03-03 19:31 -------
...is WONTFIX.
--
bangerth at gmail dot com changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |bangerth at gmail dot com
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution| |WONTFIX
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43241
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread
* [Bug libstdc++/43241] std::tr1::regex is not fully implemented yet
2010-03-03 0:17 [Bug libstdc++/43241] New: std::tr1::regex does not link pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (5 preceding siblings ...)
2010-03-03 19:31 ` bangerth at gmail dot com
@ 2010-03-03 20:11 ` paolo dot carlini at oracle dot com
2010-03-03 20:14 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
7 siblings, 0 replies; 9+ messages in thread
From: paolo dot carlini at oracle dot com @ 2010-03-03 20:11 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Comment #6 from paolo dot carlini at oracle dot com 2010-03-03 20:10 -------
Bah, frankly WONTFIX doesn't seem correct either: we are not taking about a
*bug* which we are not going to fix. We are talking about a largely
*unimplemented* part of the future C++1x standard. Now, in my opinion, almost
completely *unimplemented* features do not really belong to Bugzilla, it's way
to too early for it.
Unless we want to limit the span of this PR to the TR1 version: in that case,
WONTFIX could be slightly more correct in the sense that we may well never
implement the TR1 version of regex, but frankly it's not sure, it depends on
whether it turns out to be feasible with a decent amount of macros and such.
But I don't care much either way. I wanted only to clarify that the real issue
is known, and we (the library maintainers) we don't consider it a bug, but a
big chunk of work awaiting for somebody volunteering to do it ;)
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43241
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread
* [Bug libstdc++/43241] std::tr1::regex is not fully implemented yet
2010-03-03 0:17 [Bug libstdc++/43241] New: std::tr1::regex does not link pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (6 preceding siblings ...)
2010-03-03 20:11 ` paolo dot carlini at oracle dot com
@ 2010-03-03 20:14 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
7 siblings, 0 replies; 9+ messages in thread
From: pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2010-03-03 20:14 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Comment #7 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-03-03 20:13 -------
I should mention why I filed this bug, someone asked (on IRC) how to fix up a
link error when using std::tr1::regex. Of course I looked inside bugzilla
first and did not see any so I did not look into further than that.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43241
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread