From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 15172 invoked by alias); 4 Mar 2010 19:09:52 -0000 Received: (qmail 14744 invoked by uid 48); 4 Mar 2010 19:09:35 -0000 Date: Thu, 04 Mar 2010 19:09:00 -0000 Message-ID: <20100304190935.14743.qmail@sourceware.org> X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC References: Subject: [Bug fortran/42950] gfortran testsuite failures on mingw64 In-Reply-To: Reply-To: gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org From: "pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org" Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org X-SW-Source: 2010-03/txt/msg00411.txt.bz2 ------- Comment #5 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-03-04 19:09 ------- (In reply to comment #4) > +/* MinGW needs to use the gnu_printf formatter. */ > +#if __MINGW32__ > +# define PRINTF_FORMAT gnu_printf > +#else > +# define PRINTF_FORMAT printf > +#endif Note I would do: +/* MinGW needs to use the gnu_printf formatter. */ +#if __MINGW32__ +# define PRINTF_FORMAT __gnu_printf__ +#else +# define PRINTF_FORMAT __printf__ +#endif Just in case printf and gnu_printf are macros, I doubt it will be in this case but I helped someone where printf was a macro. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42950