From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-311055-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: (qmail 31513 invoked by alias); 10 Mar 2010 05:38:11 -0000
Received: (qmail 31402 invoked by uid 48); 10 Mar 2010 05:37:51 -0000
Date: Wed, 10 Mar 2010 05:38:00 -0000
Message-ID: <20100310053751.31400.qmail@sourceware.org>
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
References: <bug-43290-87@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Subject: [Bug debug/43290] ICE in dwarf2out_frame_debug_expr
In-Reply-To: <bug-43290-87@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Reply-To: gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
From: "hjl dot tools at gmail dot com" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
X-SW-Source: 2010-03/txt/msg00921.txt.bz2



------- Comment #17 from hjl dot tools at gmail dot com  2010-03-10 05:37 -------
(In reply to comment #15)
> Yes, sticking them in gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/guality/ and using 
> /* { dg-final { gdb-test <line> "<varname>" "<expectedvalue>" } } */
> 
> If my patch really broke that, then I think we'll need to use some REG_CFA_*
> note or something similar to be able to differentiate between this vDRAP = DRAP
> insn and saving DRAP into a prologue save slot.
> 

I will add some testcases for PR 36728 to make sure that it isn't
broken.


-- 


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43290