public inbox for gcc-bugs@sourceware.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [Bug fortran/43180] New: [4.5 Regression] Bad results without temporary copy of intent(in) argument
@ 2010-02-25 19:16 anlauf at gmx dot de
2010-02-25 19:18 ` [Bug fortran/43180] " anlauf at gmx dot de
` (13 more replies)
0 siblings, 14 replies; 15+ messages in thread
From: anlauf at gmx dot de @ 2010-02-25 19:16 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
Hi,
my large code suddenly fails with the current gfortran, while it still works
with gfortran from fortran-dev (version 20100127). I traced the problem
to the following part of a module where the invocation of a subroutine
as
call set_set_v (ru(i)% c, c) ! (notemp) Fails with current gfortran
fails (i.e., the resulting c contains bad values), while
tmp_c = ru(i)% c ! ("temp") Works
call set_set_v (tmp_c, c)
works. For details see the attached code.
I have compared the output of -fdump-tree-original of the fortran-dev
and of the trunk versions of gfortran and found that they are identical
for the "temp" variant, while there is a significant different for the
notemp variant. Maybe someone knowledgeable can identify the cause of
the problem.
--
Summary: [4.5 Regression] Bad results without temporary copy of
intent(in) argument
Product: gcc
Version: 4.5.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: fortran
AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org
ReportedBy: anlauf at gmx dot de
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43180
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 15+ messages in thread
* [Bug fortran/43180] [4.5 Regression] Bad results without temporary copy of intent(in) argument
2010-02-25 19:16 [Bug fortran/43180] New: [4.5 Regression] Bad results without temporary copy of intent(in) argument anlauf at gmx dot de
@ 2010-02-25 19:18 ` anlauf at gmx dot de
2010-02-25 19:51 ` steven at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (12 subsequent siblings)
13 siblings, 0 replies; 15+ messages in thread
From: anlauf at gmx dot de @ 2010-02-25 19:18 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Comment #1 from anlauf at gmx dot de 2010-02-25 19:18 -------
Created an attachment (id=19958)
--> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=19958&action=view)
Testcase
Testcase (module) and output of -fdump-tree-original for gfortran
from fortran-dev and trunk (4.5).
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43180
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 15+ messages in thread
* [Bug fortran/43180] [4.5 Regression] Bad results without temporary copy of intent(in) argument
2010-02-25 19:16 [Bug fortran/43180] New: [4.5 Regression] Bad results without temporary copy of intent(in) argument anlauf at gmx dot de
2010-02-25 19:18 ` [Bug fortran/43180] " anlauf at gmx dot de
@ 2010-02-25 19:51 ` steven at gcc dot gnu dot org
2010-02-25 20:45 ` jv244 at cam dot ac dot uk
` (11 subsequent siblings)
13 siblings, 0 replies; 15+ messages in thread
From: steven at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2010-02-25 19:51 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Comment #2 from steven at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-02-25 19:51 -------
Paul, looks like one of yours.
--
steven at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |pault at gcc dot gnu dot org
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Ever Confirmed|0 |1
Last reconfirmed|0000-00-00 00:00:00 |2010-02-25 19:51:38
date| |
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43180
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 15+ messages in thread
* [Bug fortran/43180] [4.5 Regression] Bad results without temporary copy of intent(in) argument
2010-02-25 19:16 [Bug fortran/43180] New: [4.5 Regression] Bad results without temporary copy of intent(in) argument anlauf at gmx dot de
2010-02-25 19:18 ` [Bug fortran/43180] " anlauf at gmx dot de
2010-02-25 19:51 ` steven at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2010-02-25 20:45 ` jv244 at cam dot ac dot uk
2010-02-25 20:59 ` anlauf at gmx dot de
` (10 subsequent siblings)
13 siblings, 0 replies; 15+ messages in thread
From: jv244 at cam dot ac dot uk @ 2010-02-25 20:45 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Comment #3 from jv244 at cam dot ac dot uk 2010-02-25 20:45 -------
(In reply to comment #1)
> Created an attachment (id=19958)
--> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=19958&action=view) [edit]
> Testcase
I'm wondering if you have a testcase that is 'fully functional' i.e. that one
can run & debug. My first guess is that a temporary there is not needed, unless
there is an aliasing problem.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43180
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 15+ messages in thread
* [Bug fortran/43180] [4.5 Regression] Bad results without temporary copy of intent(in) argument
2010-02-25 19:16 [Bug fortran/43180] New: [4.5 Regression] Bad results without temporary copy of intent(in) argument anlauf at gmx dot de
` (2 preceding siblings ...)
2010-02-25 20:45 ` jv244 at cam dot ac dot uk
@ 2010-02-25 20:59 ` anlauf at gmx dot de
2010-02-25 21:43 ` pault at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (9 subsequent siblings)
13 siblings, 0 replies; 15+ messages in thread
From: anlauf at gmx dot de @ 2010-02-25 20:59 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Comment #4 from anlauf at gmx dot de 2010-02-25 20:59 -------
(In reply to comment #3)
> (In reply to comment #1)
> > Created an attachment (id=19958)
--> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=19958&action=view) [edit]
> > Testcase
>
> I'm wondering if you have a testcase that is 'fully functional' i.e. that one
> can run & debug.
It will take some time as I need to dump a snapshot of the table
of rules and an excerpt of the input data that are processed.
Will do, but don't hold your breath.
> My first guess is that a temporary there is not needed, unless
> there is an aliasing problem.
There is no real need for a temporary copy of ru(i)%c, but as I wrote
without the copy I get wrong results. Maybe it's as simple as an
improper offset and the like.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43180
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 15+ messages in thread
* [Bug fortran/43180] [4.5 Regression] Bad results without temporary copy of intent(in) argument
2010-02-25 19:16 [Bug fortran/43180] New: [4.5 Regression] Bad results without temporary copy of intent(in) argument anlauf at gmx dot de
` (3 preceding siblings ...)
2010-02-25 20:59 ` anlauf at gmx dot de
@ 2010-02-25 21:43 ` pault at gcc dot gnu dot org
2010-02-25 22:12 ` anlauf at gmx dot de
` (8 subsequent siblings)
13 siblings, 0 replies; 15+ messages in thread
From: pault at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2010-02-25 21:43 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Comment #5 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-02-25 21:42 -------
I cannot persuade trunk to produce different output to 4.4.
I am not saying that you are wrong but I can only reiterate Joost's request for
a testcase in which the result changes for the lack of a temporary.
Paul
--
pault at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Last reconfirmed|2010-02-25 19:51:38 |2010-02-25 21:42:55
date| |
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43180
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 15+ messages in thread
* [Bug fortran/43180] [4.5 Regression] Bad results without temporary copy of intent(in) argument
2010-02-25 19:16 [Bug fortran/43180] New: [4.5 Regression] Bad results without temporary copy of intent(in) argument anlauf at gmx dot de
` (4 preceding siblings ...)
2010-02-25 21:43 ` pault at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2010-02-25 22:12 ` anlauf at gmx dot de
2010-02-25 22:16 ` dominiq at lps dot ens dot fr
` (7 subsequent siblings)
13 siblings, 0 replies; 15+ messages in thread
From: anlauf at gmx dot de @ 2010-02-25 22:12 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Comment #6 from anlauf at gmx dot de 2010-02-25 22:12 -------
(In reply to comment #5)
> I cannot persuade trunk to produce different output to 4.4.
>
> I am not saying that you are wrong but I can only reiterate Joost's request for
> a testcase in which the result changes for the lack of a temporary.
Printing the argument src in the contained subroutine set_set_v
shows that it contains junk on ia32 if there is no temporary.
I'm working on a self-contained test case.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43180
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 15+ messages in thread
* [Bug fortran/43180] [4.5 Regression] Bad results without temporary copy of intent(in) argument
2010-02-25 19:16 [Bug fortran/43180] New: [4.5 Regression] Bad results without temporary copy of intent(in) argument anlauf at gmx dot de
` (5 preceding siblings ...)
2010-02-25 22:12 ` anlauf at gmx dot de
@ 2010-02-25 22:16 ` dominiq at lps dot ens dot fr
2010-02-25 22:27 ` anlauf at gmx dot de
` (6 subsequent siblings)
13 siblings, 0 replies; 15+ messages in thread
From: dominiq at lps dot ens dot fr @ 2010-02-25 22:16 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Comment #7 from dominiq at lps dot ens dot fr 2010-02-25 22:16 -------
Comparing the original dumps for revisions 156618 and 157068, I see:
< parm.19.dim[0].ubound = 50;
< parm.19.dim[0].stride = 1;
< parm.19.data = (void *) &ru[(integer(kind=8)) i +
-1].c[0];
< parm.19.offset = -1;
< D.1619 = _gfortran_internal_pack (&parm.19);
...
> parm.19.dim[0].ubound = D.1620;
> parm.19.dim[0].stride = NON_LVALUE_EXPR <D.1625>;
> parm.19.data = (void *) &(*c.0)[0];
> parm.19.offset = NON_LVALUE_EXPR <D.1624>;
Are the NON_LVALUE_EXPR expected?
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43180
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 15+ messages in thread
* [Bug fortran/43180] [4.5 Regression] Bad results without temporary copy of intent(in) argument
2010-02-25 19:16 [Bug fortran/43180] New: [4.5 Regression] Bad results without temporary copy of intent(in) argument anlauf at gmx dot de
` (6 preceding siblings ...)
2010-02-25 22:16 ` dominiq at lps dot ens dot fr
@ 2010-02-25 22:27 ` anlauf at gmx dot de
2010-02-25 23:38 ` burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (5 subsequent siblings)
13 siblings, 0 replies; 15+ messages in thread
From: anlauf at gmx dot de @ 2010-02-25 22:27 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Comment #8 from anlauf at gmx dot de 2010-02-25 22:26 -------
Created an attachment (id=19961)
--> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=19961&action=view)
Stand-alone test
I get:
get_rule: ru(i)% c(1) =
-1000000000 -1000000000 -1000000000.00000000 -1000000000.00000000
-1000000000.00000000 -1000000000.00000000 -1000000000.00000000
-1000000000.00000000 -1000000000.00000000 -1000000000.00000000
-1000000000.00000000 -1000000000.00000000 -1000000000.00000000
-1000000000 -127
Using temporary:
set_set_v: src(1) =
-1000000000 -1000000000 -1000000000.00000000 -1000000000.00000000
-1000000000.00000000 -1000000000.00000000 -1000000000.00000000
-1000000000.00000000 -1000000000.00000000 -1000000000.00000000
-1000000000.00000000 -1000000000.00000000 -1000000000.00000000
-1000000000 -127
No temporary:
set_set_v: src(1) =
538976288 538976288 6.01347001699906849E-154 6.01347001699906849E-154
6.01347001699906849E-154 6.01347001699906849E-154 -3.13018361251940323E+021
-1000000000.00000000 -1000000000.00000000 -1000000000.00000000
-1000000000.00000000 -1000000000.00000000 -1000000000.00000000
0 101
No problem with older gfortrans.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43180
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 15+ messages in thread
* [Bug fortran/43180] [4.5 Regression] Bad results without temporary copy of intent(in) argument
2010-02-25 19:16 [Bug fortran/43180] New: [4.5 Regression] Bad results without temporary copy of intent(in) argument anlauf at gmx dot de
` (7 preceding siblings ...)
2010-02-25 22:27 ` anlauf at gmx dot de
@ 2010-02-25 23:38 ` burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org
2010-02-26 7:30 ` burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (4 subsequent siblings)
13 siblings, 0 replies; 15+ messages in thread
From: burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2010-02-25 23:38 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Comment #9 from burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-02-25 23:38 -------
Reduced test case below. The problem is the call. On the trunk the call looks
as follows:
set_set_v (&ru, D.1578);
which is complete nonesense. It should be:
&ru.data[0].c.use
or something like that. If one removes the "comment" component, it works - but
only because then "&ru" and "&ru.data[0].c.use" point to the same memory -
otherwise it is as wrong as before.
! ------------------------
module mo_obs_rules
type t_set
integer :: use = 42
end type t_set
type t_rules
character(len=40) :: comment
type(t_set) :: c (1)
end type t_rules
type (t_rules), save :: ru (1)
contains
subroutine get_rule (c)
type(t_set) :: c (:)
! print *, ru(1)%c(1)%use ! 42 -> OK
! print *, c(1)%use ! 42 -> OK
call set_set_v (ru(1)%c, c)
contains
subroutine set_set_v (src, dst)
type(t_set), intent(in) :: src(1)
type(t_set), intent(inout) :: dst(1)
! print *, src(1)%use ! garbage (should be 42)
! print *, dst(1)%use ! 42 -> OK
end subroutine set_set_v
end subroutine get_rule
end module mo_obs_rules
program test
use mo_obs_rules
type(t_set) :: c (1)
call get_rule (c)
end program test
--
burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Last reconfirmed|2010-02-25 21:42:55 |2010-02-25 23:38:17
date| |
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43180
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 15+ messages in thread
* [Bug fortran/43180] [4.5 Regression] Bad results without temporary copy of intent(in) argument
2010-02-25 19:16 [Bug fortran/43180] New: [4.5 Regression] Bad results without temporary copy of intent(in) argument anlauf at gmx dot de
` (8 preceding siblings ...)
2010-02-25 23:38 ` burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2010-02-26 7:30 ` burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org
2010-02-28 13:46 ` pault at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (3 subsequent siblings)
13 siblings, 0 replies; 15+ messages in thread
From: burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2010-02-26 7:30 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
--
burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Keywords| |wrong-code
Priority|P3 |P4
Target Milestone|--- |4.5.0
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43180
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 15+ messages in thread
* [Bug fortran/43180] [4.5 Regression] Bad results without temporary copy of intent(in) argument
2010-02-25 19:16 [Bug fortran/43180] New: [4.5 Regression] Bad results without temporary copy of intent(in) argument anlauf at gmx dot de
` (9 preceding siblings ...)
2010-02-26 7:30 ` burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2010-02-28 13:46 ` pault at gcc dot gnu dot org
2010-03-02 11:58 ` pault at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (2 subsequent siblings)
13 siblings, 0 replies; 15+ messages in thread
From: pault at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2010-02-28 13:46 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
[-- Warning: decoded text below may be mangled, UTF-8 assumed --]
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 906 bytes --]
------- Comment #10 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-02-28 13:46 -------
(In reply to comment #9)
> Reduced test case below. The problem is the call. On the trunk the call looks
> as follows:
> set_set_v (&ru, D.1578);
> which is complete nonesense. It should be:
> &ru.data[0].c.use
> or something like that. If one removes the "comment" component, it works - but
> only because then "&ru" and "&ru.data[0].c.use" point to the same memory -
> otherwise it is as wrong as before.
Yes, indeed - that is the problem. Since the need for a temporary has been
removed, the code now runs straight into line trans-array.c:5515. The
condition !sym->as causes tmp to be used as the actual, rather than calling
gfc_conv_expr_descriptor.
Just as soon as todayÅ› clean build stops, I will remove the condition and will
try a regtest.
Paul
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43180
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 15+ messages in thread
* [Bug fortran/43180] [4.5 Regression] Bad results without temporary copy of intent(in) argument
2010-02-25 19:16 [Bug fortran/43180] New: [4.5 Regression] Bad results without temporary copy of intent(in) argument anlauf at gmx dot de
` (10 preceding siblings ...)
2010-02-28 13:46 ` pault at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2010-03-02 11:58 ` pault at gcc dot gnu dot org
2010-03-02 12:11 ` pault at gcc dot gnu dot org
2010-03-13 17:02 ` hjl at gcc dot gnu dot org
13 siblings, 0 replies; 15+ messages in thread
From: pault at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2010-03-02 11:58 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Comment #11 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-03-02 11:58 -------
Subject: Bug 43180
Author: pault
Date: Tue Mar 2 11:58:02 2010
New Revision: 157163
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=157163
Log:
2010-03-02 Paul Thomas <pault@gcc.gnu.org>
PR fortran/43180
* trans-array.c (gfc_conv_array_parameter): A full array of
derived type need not be restricted to a symbol without an
array spec to use the call to gfc_conv_expr_descriptor.
PR fortran/43173
* trans-array.c (gfc_conv_array_parameter): Contiguous refs to
allocatable arrays do not need temporaries.
2010-03-02 Paul Thomas <pault@gcc.gnu.org>
PR fortran/43180
* gfortran.dg/internal_pack_10.f90: New test.
PR fortran/43173
* gfortran.dg/internal_pack_11.f90: New test.
Added:
trunk/gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/internal_pack_10.f90
trunk/gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/internal_pack_11.f90
Modified:
trunk/gcc/fortran/ChangeLog
trunk/gcc/fortran/trans-array.c
trunk/gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43180
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 15+ messages in thread
* [Bug fortran/43180] [4.5 Regression] Bad results without temporary copy of intent(in) argument
2010-02-25 19:16 [Bug fortran/43180] New: [4.5 Regression] Bad results without temporary copy of intent(in) argument anlauf at gmx dot de
` (11 preceding siblings ...)
2010-03-02 11:58 ` pault at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2010-03-02 12:11 ` pault at gcc dot gnu dot org
2010-03-13 17:02 ` hjl at gcc dot gnu dot org
13 siblings, 0 replies; 15+ messages in thread
From: pault at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2010-03-02 12:11 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Comment #12 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-03-02 12:11 -------
Fixed on trunk, thanks for the report!
Paul
--
pault at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution| |FIXED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43180
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 15+ messages in thread
* [Bug fortran/43180] [4.5 Regression] Bad results without temporary copy of intent(in) argument
2010-02-25 19:16 [Bug fortran/43180] New: [4.5 Regression] Bad results without temporary copy of intent(in) argument anlauf at gmx dot de
` (12 preceding siblings ...)
2010-03-02 12:11 ` pault at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2010-03-13 17:02 ` hjl at gcc dot gnu dot org
13 siblings, 0 replies; 15+ messages in thread
From: hjl at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2010-03-13 17:02 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Comment #13 from hjl at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-03-13 16:59 -------
Subject: Bug 43180
Author: hjl
Date: Sat Mar 13 16:58:19 2010
New Revision: 157426
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=157426
Log:
Backport testcases from mainline.
2010-03-13 H.J. Lu <hongjiu.lu@intel.com>
Backport from mainline:
2010-03-11 Martin Jambor <mjambor@suse.cz>
PR tree-optimization/43257
* g++.dg/torture/pr43257.C: New test.
2010-03-11 Richard Guenther <rguenther@suse.de>
PR tree-optimization/43255
* gcc.c-torture/compile/pr43255.c: New testcase.
2010-03-11 Andreas Krebbel <Andreas.Krebbel@de.ibm.com>
* gcc.dg/pr43280.c: New testcase.
2010-03-10 Jan Hubicka <jh@suse.cz>
* gcc.c-torture/compile/pr43288.c: New test.
2010-03-10 Andrey Belevantsev <abel@ispras.ru>
PR middle-end/42859
* g++.dg/eh/pr42859.C: New test.
2010-03-09 Jakub Jelinek <jakub@redhat.com>
PR debug/43299
* gcc.dg/pr43299.c: New test.
2010-03-08 Richard Guenther <rguenther@suse.de>
PR tree-optimization/43269
* gcc.c-torture/execute/pr43269.c: New testcase.
2010-03-04 Martin Jambor <mjambor@suse.cz>
PR tree-optimization/43164
PR tree-optimization/43191
* gcc.c-torture/compile/pr43164.c: New test.
* gcc.c-torture/compile/pr43191.c: Likewise.
2010-03-04 Changpeng Fang <changpeng.fang@amd.com>
PR middle-end/43209
* gcc.dg/tree-ssa/ivopts-4.c: New.
2010-03-03 Jakub Jelinek <jakub@redhat.com>
PR debug/43229
* gfortran.dg/pr43229.f90: New test.
PR debug/43237
* gcc.dg/debug/dwarf2/pr43237.c: New test.
2010-03-02 Paul Thomas <pault@gcc.gnu.org>
PR fortran/43180
* gfortran.dg/internal_pack_10.f90: New test.
2010-02-26 Richard Guenther <rguenther@suse.de>
PR tree-optimization/43188
* gcc.c-torture/compile/pr43188.c: New testcase.
2010-02-25 Jakub Jelinek <jakub@redhat.com>
PR debug/43166
* gfortran.dg/debug/pr43166.f: New test.
PR debug/43165
* gcc.dg/torture/pr43165.c: New test.
2010-02-23 Jakub Jelinek <jakub@redhat.com>
PR target/43107
* gcc.target/i386/pr43107.c: New test.
Added:
branches/gcc-4_4-branch/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/eh/pr42859.C
- copied unchanged from r157425, trunk/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/eh/pr42859.C
branches/gcc-4_4-branch/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/torture/pr43257.C
- copied unchanged from r157425,
trunk/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/torture/pr43257.C
branches/gcc-4_4-branch/gcc/testsuite/gcc.c-torture/compile/pr43164.c
- copied unchanged from r157425,
trunk/gcc/testsuite/gcc.c-torture/compile/pr43164.c
branches/gcc-4_4-branch/gcc/testsuite/gcc.c-torture/compile/pr43188.c
- copied unchanged from r157425,
trunk/gcc/testsuite/gcc.c-torture/compile/pr43188.c
branches/gcc-4_4-branch/gcc/testsuite/gcc.c-torture/compile/pr43191.c
- copied unchanged from r157425,
trunk/gcc/testsuite/gcc.c-torture/compile/pr43191.c
branches/gcc-4_4-branch/gcc/testsuite/gcc.c-torture/compile/pr43255.c
- copied unchanged from r157425,
trunk/gcc/testsuite/gcc.c-torture/compile/pr43255.c
branches/gcc-4_4-branch/gcc/testsuite/gcc.c-torture/compile/pr43288.c
- copied unchanged from r157425,
trunk/gcc/testsuite/gcc.c-torture/compile/pr43288.c
branches/gcc-4_4-branch/gcc/testsuite/gcc.c-torture/execute/pr43269.c
- copied unchanged from r157425,
trunk/gcc/testsuite/gcc.c-torture/execute/pr43269.c
branches/gcc-4_4-branch/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/debug/dwarf2/pr43237.c
- copied unchanged from r157425,
trunk/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/debug/dwarf2/pr43237.c
branches/gcc-4_4-branch/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/pr43280.c
- copied unchanged from r157425, trunk/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/pr43280.c
branches/gcc-4_4-branch/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/pr43299.c
- copied unchanged from r157425, trunk/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/pr43299.c
branches/gcc-4_4-branch/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/torture/pr43165.c
- copied unchanged from r157425,
trunk/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/torture/pr43165.c
branches/gcc-4_4-branch/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/tree-ssa/ivopts-4.c
- copied unchanged from r157425,
trunk/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/tree-ssa/ivopts-4.c
branches/gcc-4_4-branch/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/i386/pr43107.c
- copied unchanged from r157425,
trunk/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/i386/pr43107.c
branches/gcc-4_4-branch/gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/debug/pr43166.f
- copied unchanged from r157425,
trunk/gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/debug/pr43166.f
branches/gcc-4_4-branch/gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/internal_pack_10.f90
- copied unchanged from r157425,
trunk/gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/internal_pack_10.f90
branches/gcc-4_4-branch/gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/pr43229.f90
- copied unchanged from r157425,
trunk/gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/pr43229.f90
Modified:
branches/gcc-4_4-branch/gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43180
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 15+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2010-03-13 17:01 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 15+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2010-02-25 19:16 [Bug fortran/43180] New: [4.5 Regression] Bad results without temporary copy of intent(in) argument anlauf at gmx dot de
2010-02-25 19:18 ` [Bug fortran/43180] " anlauf at gmx dot de
2010-02-25 19:51 ` steven at gcc dot gnu dot org
2010-02-25 20:45 ` jv244 at cam dot ac dot uk
2010-02-25 20:59 ` anlauf at gmx dot de
2010-02-25 21:43 ` pault at gcc dot gnu dot org
2010-02-25 22:12 ` anlauf at gmx dot de
2010-02-25 22:16 ` dominiq at lps dot ens dot fr
2010-02-25 22:27 ` anlauf at gmx dot de
2010-02-25 23:38 ` burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org
2010-02-26 7:30 ` burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org
2010-02-28 13:46 ` pault at gcc dot gnu dot org
2010-03-02 11:58 ` pault at gcc dot gnu dot org
2010-03-02 12:11 ` pault at gcc dot gnu dot org
2010-03-13 17:02 ` hjl at gcc dot gnu dot org
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).