* [Bug c++/19159] [4.0/4.1 Regression] Undefined symbol: vtable for __cxxabiv1::__vmi_class_type_info
[not found] <bug-19159-276@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
@ 2005-10-31 2:08 ` mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org
2006-02-24 0:26 ` [Bug c++/19159] [4.0/4.1/4.2 " mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (13 subsequent siblings)
14 siblings, 0 replies; 15+ messages in thread
From: mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2005-10-31 2:08 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Comment #34 from mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-10-31 02:08 -------
According to the thread starting with the reference in Comment #31, this is
just a spurious warning on systems without weak symbols. As such, it's never
going to be release-critical.
The two leading proposals were made for resolving the problem: (1) use a
dynamic initialization on systems without weak symbols, or (2) warn only if the
static variable is actually addressed, as otherwise the fact that there are
multiple copies doesn't matter. I agree with Jason that (2) is the best
option, and it should be relatively easy to implement, given that we already
mark things as addressed; we could just move the warning to that location.
--
mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Keywords|link-failure |diagnostic
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19159
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 15+ messages in thread* [Bug c++/19159] [4.0/4.1/4.2 Regression] Undefined symbol: vtable for __cxxabiv1::__vmi_class_type_info
[not found] <bug-19159-276@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
2005-10-31 2:08 ` [Bug c++/19159] [4.0/4.1 Regression] Undefined symbol: vtable for __cxxabiv1::__vmi_class_type_info mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2006-02-24 0:26 ` mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org
2006-05-25 2:32 ` mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (12 subsequent siblings)
14 siblings, 0 replies; 15+ messages in thread
From: mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2006-02-24 0:26 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Comment #35 from mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-02-24 00:25 -------
This issue will not be resolved in GCC 4.1.0; retargeted at GCC 4.1.1.
--
mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Target Milestone|4.0.3 |4.1.1
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19159
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 15+ messages in thread* [Bug c++/19159] [4.0/4.1/4.2 Regression] Undefined symbol: vtable for __cxxabiv1::__vmi_class_type_info
[not found] <bug-19159-276@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
2005-10-31 2:08 ` [Bug c++/19159] [4.0/4.1 Regression] Undefined symbol: vtable for __cxxabiv1::__vmi_class_type_info mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org
2006-02-24 0:26 ` [Bug c++/19159] [4.0/4.1/4.2 " mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2006-05-25 2:32 ` mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org
2007-02-14 9:04 ` [Bug c++/19159] [4.0/4.1/4.2/4.3 " mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (11 subsequent siblings)
14 siblings, 0 replies; 15+ messages in thread
From: mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2006-05-25 2:32 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Comment #36 from mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-05-25 02:32 -------
Will not be fixed in 4.1.1; adjust target milestone to 4.1.2.
--
mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Target Milestone|4.1.1 |4.1.2
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19159
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 15+ messages in thread* [Bug c++/19159] [4.0/4.1/4.2/4.3 Regression] Undefined symbol: vtable for __cxxabiv1::__vmi_class_type_info
[not found] <bug-19159-276@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
` (2 preceding siblings ...)
2006-05-25 2:32 ` mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2007-02-14 9:04 ` mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org
2007-12-16 23:17 ` steven at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (10 subsequent siblings)
14 siblings, 0 replies; 15+ messages in thread
From: mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2007-02-14 9:04 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
--
mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Target Milestone|4.1.2 |4.1.3
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19159
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 15+ messages in thread* [Bug c++/19159] [4.0/4.1/4.2/4.3 Regression] Undefined symbol: vtable for __cxxabiv1::__vmi_class_type_info
[not found] <bug-19159-276@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
` (3 preceding siblings ...)
2007-02-14 9:04 ` [Bug c++/19159] [4.0/4.1/4.2/4.3 " mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2007-12-16 23:17 ` steven at gcc dot gnu dot org
2007-12-17 2:02 ` dave at hiauly1 dot hia dot nrc dot ca
` (9 subsequent siblings)
14 siblings, 0 replies; 15+ messages in thread
From: steven at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2007-12-16 23:17 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Comment #37 from steven at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-12-16 23:17 -------
Open regression with no activity since February 14. Ping?
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19159
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 15+ messages in thread* [Bug c++/19159] [4.0/4.1/4.2/4.3 Regression] Undefined symbol: vtable for __cxxabiv1::__vmi_class_type_info
[not found] <bug-19159-276@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
` (4 preceding siblings ...)
2007-12-16 23:17 ` steven at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2007-12-17 2:02 ` dave at hiauly1 dot hia dot nrc dot ca
2007-12-17 2:07 ` mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (8 subsequent siblings)
14 siblings, 0 replies; 15+ messages in thread
From: dave at hiauly1 dot hia dot nrc dot ca @ 2007-12-17 2:02 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Comment #38 from dave at hiauly1 dot hia dot nrc dot ca 2007-12-17 02:02 -------
Subject: Re: [4.0/4.1/4.2/4.3 Regression] Undefined symbol: vtable for
__cxxabiv1::__vmi_class_type_info
> Open regression with no activity since February 14. Ping?
No update from my side. I don't usually build and test the AIX
port, so I'm not aware if there's been any progress. I was asked
by a client to work on trying to improve the C++ support in 4.x.
At the moment, they are still using 3.4.3.
Dave
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19159
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 15+ messages in thread* [Bug c++/19159] [4.0/4.1/4.2/4.3 Regression] Undefined symbol: vtable for __cxxabiv1::__vmi_class_type_info
[not found] <bug-19159-276@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
` (5 preceding siblings ...)
2007-12-17 2:02 ` dave at hiauly1 dot hia dot nrc dot ca
@ 2007-12-17 2:07 ` mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org
2008-02-07 19:40 ` dave at genussoft dot com
` (7 subsequent siblings)
14 siblings, 0 replies; 15+ messages in thread
From: mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2007-12-17 2:07 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Comment #39 from mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-12-17 02:07 -------
Downgraded to P4 based on Comment #34.
--
mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Priority|P2 |P4
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19159
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 15+ messages in thread* [Bug c++/19159] [4.0/4.1/4.2/4.3 Regression] Undefined symbol: vtable for __cxxabiv1::__vmi_class_type_info
[not found] <bug-19159-276@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
` (6 preceding siblings ...)
2007-12-17 2:07 ` mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2008-02-07 19:40 ` dave at genussoft dot com
2008-07-04 16:48 ` [Bug c++/19159] [4.2/4.3/4.4 " jsm28 at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (6 subsequent siblings)
14 siblings, 0 replies; 15+ messages in thread
From: dave at genussoft dot com @ 2008-02-07 19:40 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Comment #40 from dave at genussoft dot com 2008-02-07 19:39 -------
I am trying to use g++ 4.0.0 on AIX 5.3 and have run into this problem and also
the problem reported in bug 18257. What recommendation do you have for using
g++ on AIX? Should I go back to an earlier version, or has this problem been
resolved in the 4.2.2 version?
--
dave at genussoft dot com changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |dave at genussoft dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19159
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 15+ messages in thread* [Bug c++/19159] [4.2/4.3/4.4 Regression] Undefined symbol: vtable for __cxxabiv1::__vmi_class_type_info
[not found] <bug-19159-276@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
` (7 preceding siblings ...)
2008-02-07 19:40 ` dave at genussoft dot com
@ 2008-07-04 16:48 ` jsm28 at gcc dot gnu dot org
2008-10-31 13:31 ` bill dot oliver at sas dot com
` (5 subsequent siblings)
14 siblings, 0 replies; 15+ messages in thread
From: jsm28 at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2008-07-04 16:48 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Comment #41 from jsm28 at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-07-04 16:47 -------
Closing 4.1 branch.
--
jsm28 at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Summary|[4.1/4.2/4.3/4.4 Regression]|[4.2/4.3/4.4 Regression]
|Undefined symbol: vtable for|Undefined symbol: vtable for
|__cxxabiv1::__vmi_class_type|__cxxabiv1::__vmi_class_type
|_info |_info
Target Milestone|4.1.3 |4.2.5
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19159
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 15+ messages in thread* [Bug c++/19159] [4.2/4.3/4.4 Regression] Undefined symbol: vtable for __cxxabiv1::__vmi_class_type_info
[not found] <bug-19159-276@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
` (8 preceding siblings ...)
2008-07-04 16:48 ` [Bug c++/19159] [4.2/4.3/4.4 " jsm28 at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2008-10-31 13:31 ` bill dot oliver at sas dot com
2009-03-31 16:43 ` [Bug c++/19159] [4.3/4.4/4.5 " jsm28 at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (4 subsequent siblings)
14 siblings, 0 replies; 15+ messages in thread
From: bill dot oliver at sas dot com @ 2008-10-31 13:31 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Comment #42 from bill dot oliver at sas dot com 2008-10-31 13:30 -------
I saw Dave C's post. I am also using 4.0.0 on AIX, and seeing this problem. I'm
attempting to build Firebird SQL open source. What recommendation do you have
for using g++ on AIX? Should I go back to an earlier version, or where has this
problem been resolved? Thanks!
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19159
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 15+ messages in thread* [Bug c++/19159] [4.3/4.4/4.5 Regression] Undefined symbol: vtable for __cxxabiv1::__vmi_class_type_info
[not found] <bug-19159-276@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
` (9 preceding siblings ...)
2008-10-31 13:31 ` bill dot oliver at sas dot com
@ 2009-03-31 16:43 ` jsm28 at gcc dot gnu dot org
2009-08-04 12:28 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (3 subsequent siblings)
14 siblings, 0 replies; 15+ messages in thread
From: jsm28 at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2009-03-31 16:43 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Comment #43 from jsm28 at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-03-31 16:43 -------
Closing 4.2 branch.
--
jsm28 at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Summary|[4.2/4.3/4.4/4.5 Regression]|[4.3/4.4/4.5 Regression]
|Undefined symbol: vtable for|Undefined symbol: vtable for
|__cxxabiv1::__vmi_class_type|__cxxabiv1::__vmi_class_type
|_info |_info
Target Milestone|4.2.5 |4.3.4
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19159
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 15+ messages in thread* [Bug c++/19159] [4.3/4.4/4.5 Regression] Undefined symbol: vtable for __cxxabiv1::__vmi_class_type_info
[not found] <bug-19159-276@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
` (10 preceding siblings ...)
2009-03-31 16:43 ` [Bug c++/19159] [4.3/4.4/4.5 " jsm28 at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2009-08-04 12:28 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
2010-03-21 12:14 ` steven at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (2 subsequent siblings)
14 siblings, 0 replies; 15+ messages in thread
From: rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2009-08-04 12:28 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Comment #44 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-08-04 12:26 -------
GCC 4.3.4 is being released, adjusting target milestone.
--
rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Target Milestone|4.3.4 |4.3.5
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19159
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 15+ messages in thread* [Bug c++/19159] [4.3/4.4/4.5 Regression] Undefined symbol: vtable for __cxxabiv1::__vmi_class_type_info
[not found] <bug-19159-276@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
` (11 preceding siblings ...)
2009-08-04 12:28 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2010-03-21 12:14 ` steven at gcc dot gnu dot org
2010-03-21 14:03 ` dave at hiauly1 dot hia dot nrc dot ca
2010-03-21 16:47 ` mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org
14 siblings, 0 replies; 15+ messages in thread
From: steven at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2010-03-21 12:14 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Comment #45 from steven at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-03-21 12:14 -------
Mark, I'm assuming you have no plans to work on this? If so, please unassign
yourself from this bug.
Can anyone reconfirm this bug for GCC 4.4 and/or GCC 4.5?
--
steven at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|ASSIGNED |WAITING
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19159
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 15+ messages in thread* [Bug c++/19159] [4.3/4.4/4.5 Regression] Undefined symbol: vtable for __cxxabiv1::__vmi_class_type_info
[not found] <bug-19159-276@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
` (12 preceding siblings ...)
2010-03-21 12:14 ` steven at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2010-03-21 14:03 ` dave at hiauly1 dot hia dot nrc dot ca
2010-03-21 16:47 ` mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org
14 siblings, 0 replies; 15+ messages in thread
From: dave at hiauly1 dot hia dot nrc dot ca @ 2010-03-21 14:03 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Comment #46 from dave at hiauly1 dot hia dot nrc dot ca 2010-03-21 14:03 -------
Subject: Re: [4.3/4.4/4.5 Regression] Undefined symbol: vtable for
__cxxabiv1::__vmi_class_type_info
> Can anyone reconfirm this bug for GCC 4.4 and/or GCC 4.5?
I think this bug should be closed. While the bug may not be fixed,
I can't currently reconfirm. This report arose from work I did several
years ago.
Dave
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19159
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 15+ messages in thread* [Bug c++/19159] [4.3/4.4/4.5 Regression] Undefined symbol: vtable for __cxxabiv1::__vmi_class_type_info
[not found] <bug-19159-276@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
` (13 preceding siblings ...)
2010-03-21 14:03 ` dave at hiauly1 dot hia dot nrc dot ca
@ 2010-03-21 16:47 ` mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org
14 siblings, 0 replies; 15+ messages in thread
From: mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2010-03-21 16:47 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Comment #47 from mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-03-21 16:47 -------
Closed at request of submitter.
--
mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|WAITING |RESOLVED
Resolution| |WORKSFORME
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19159
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 15+ messages in thread