From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 27826 invoked by alias); 31 Mar 2010 23:30:54 -0000 Received: (qmail 27565 invoked by uid 48); 31 Mar 2010 23:30:28 -0000 Date: Wed, 31 Mar 2010 23:30:00 -0000 Message-ID: <20100331233028.27564.qmail@sourceware.org> X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC References: Subject: [Bug middle-end/43602] ___emutls_v.__gcov_indirect_call_[counters|callee] undefined on *-*-darwin* In-Reply-To: Reply-To: gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org From: "howarth at nitro dot med dot uc dot edu" Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org X-SW-Source: 2010-03/txt/msg03221.txt.bz2 ------- Comment #10 from howarth at nitro dot med dot uc dot edu 2010-03-31 23:30 ------- Is it expected that the lines... /* Add code: static gcov* __gcov_indirect_call_counters; // pointer to actual counter static void* __gcov_indirect_call_callee; // actual callee address */ are commented in tree-profile.c? It is curious that these happen to be the same two symbols that end up unresolved. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43602