From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 22203 invoked by alias); 1 Apr 2010 20:51:35 -0000 Received: (qmail 22016 invoked by alias); 1 Apr 2010 20:51:20 -0000 Date: Thu, 01 Apr 2010 20:51:00 -0000 Message-ID: <20100401205120.22006.qmail@sourceware.org> X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC References: Subject: [Bug libfortran/43572] [4.5 Regression] FAIL: gfortran.dg/PR19872.f execution test; formatted read - wrong numbers In-Reply-To: Reply-To: gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org From: "dave at hiauly1 dot hia dot nrc dot ca" Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org X-SW-Source: 2010-04/txt/msg00137.txt.bz2 ------- Comment #6 from dave at hiauly1 dot hia dot nrc dot ca 2010-04-01 20:51 ------- Subject: Re: [4.5 Regression] FAIL: gfortran.dg/PR19872.f execution test; formatted read - wrong numbers > Can you also do the following: Using the 4.4 or 4.5 binary with the 4.5 or 4.4 > libgfortran. I suspect that libgfortran has a bug. As some bugfixes went also > into 4.4.x, it might be that the latest 4.4.x branch has the same bug. - At > least finding the regression-causing bug should be easier if it is in > libgfortran as one can rather quickly build it, without rebuilding the while of >>From my posted test results, I see revision 148947 was ok and 149580 was bad. See and . Dave -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43572