public inbox for gcc-bugs@sourceware.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "ramana at gcc dot gnu dot org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug middle-end/42509] [4.5 Regression] bootstrap failure in stage3 (integer overflow in preprocessor expression)
Date: Fri, 02 Apr 2010 00:02:00 -0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20100402000139.6332.qmail@sourceware.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <bug-42509-11764@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>



------- Comment #18 from ramana at gcc dot gnu dot org  2010-04-02 00:01 -------

A work around I tried was to make cross-jumping run dependent on CSA which is
probably a heavy weight work around to what looks like a different problem. It
ended up retaining the correct ALIAS fields in this case but that's a heavy
weight solution and will in most likely hood make this bug go latent again. 

I'm travelling the next few days with minimal network access and given this
needs a MI expert to look at this - so can't actively work on this till I get
back next Tuesday . Hence un-assigning myself from it. 


Index: combine-stack-adj.c
===================================================================
--- combine-stack-adj.c (revision 157912)
+++ combine-stack-adj.c (working copy)
@@ -552,7 +552,6 @@ gate_handle_stack_adjustments (void)
 static unsigned int
 rest_of_handle_stack_adjustments (void)
 {
-  cleanup_cfg (flag_crossjumping ? CLEANUP_CROSSJUMP : 0);

   /* This is kind of a heuristic.  We need to run combine_stack_adjustments
      even for machines with possibly nonzero RETURN_POPS_ARGS
@@ -562,6 +561,7 @@ rest_of_handle_stack_adjustments (void)
   if (!ACCUMULATE_OUTGOING_ARGS)
 #endif
     {
+      cleanup_cfg (flag_crossjumping ? CLEANUP_CROSSJUMP : 0);
       df_note_add_problem ();
       df_analyze ();
       combine_stack_adjustments ();


-- 

ramana at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
         AssignedTo|ramana at gcc dot gnu dot   |unassigned at gcc dot gnu
                   |org                         |dot org
             Status|ASSIGNED                    |NEW


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42509


  parent reply	other threads:[~2010-04-02  0:02 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 34+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2009-12-26 12:03 [Bug target/42509] New: " doko at ubuntu dot com
2009-12-29 10:09 ` [Bug target/42509] " ramana at gcc dot gnu dot org
2009-12-30 23:55 ` ramana at gcc dot gnu dot org
2009-12-31 15:21 ` [Bug target/42509] [4.5 Regression] " rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
2010-01-06 12:26 ` ramana at gcc dot gnu dot org
2010-01-07 13:53 ` debian-gcc at lists dot debian dot org
2010-03-15 13:23 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
2010-03-15 17:36 ` laurent at guerby dot net
2010-03-16  8:57 ` ramana at gcc dot gnu dot org
2010-03-16 13:56 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
2010-04-01 15:03 ` rearnsha at gcc dot gnu dot org
2010-04-01 15:11 ` rearnsha at gcc dot gnu dot org
2010-04-01 15:32 ` rearnsha at gcc dot gnu dot org
2010-04-01 15:55 ` ramana at gcc dot gnu dot org
2010-04-01 17:11 ` ramana at gcc dot gnu dot org
2010-04-01 19:31 ` rearnsha at gcc dot gnu dot org
2010-04-01 22:04 ` rearnsha at gcc dot gnu dot org
2010-04-01 22:44 ` rearnsha at gcc dot gnu dot org
2010-04-01 23:34 ` [Bug middle-end/42509] " rearnsha at gcc dot gnu dot org
2010-04-02  0:02 ` ramana at gcc dot gnu dot org [this message]
2010-04-02  8:08 ` ramana at gcc dot gnu dot org
2010-04-02 12:09 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
2010-04-02 12:15 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
2010-04-02 12:33 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
2010-04-02 13:54 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
2010-04-02 15:20 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
2010-04-02 16:15 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
2010-04-03 17:15 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
2010-04-03 17:15 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
2010-04-12 19:56 ` [Bug middle-end/42509] [4.4 " steven at gcc dot gnu dot org
2010-04-12 19:58 ` [Bug middle-end/42509] [4.4 Regression] nonoverlapping_memrefs_p misinterprets NULL MEM_OFFSET as const0_rtx steven at gcc dot gnu dot org
2010-04-30  8:58 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org
2010-07-28 18:00 ` uweigand at gcc dot gnu dot org
2010-07-28 18:01 ` uweigand at gcc dot gnu dot org

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20100402000139.6332.qmail@sourceware.org \
    --to=gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org \
    --cc=gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).