From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 24360 invoked by alias); 2 Apr 2010 08:08:23 -0000 Received: (qmail 22612 invoked by uid 48); 2 Apr 2010 08:07:58 -0000 Date: Fri, 02 Apr 2010 08:08:00 -0000 Message-ID: <20100402080758.22611.qmail@sourceware.org> X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC References: Subject: [Bug middle-end/42509] [4.5 Regression] bootstrap failure in stage3 (integer overflow in preprocessor expression) In-Reply-To: Reply-To: gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org From: "ramana at gcc dot gnu dot org" Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org X-SW-Source: 2010-04/txt/msg00174.txt.bz2 ------- Comment #19 from ramana at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-04-02 08:07 ------- A bootstrap on an A9 board last night with : /home/ramrad01/trunk/configure --enable-languages=c --with-mode=thumb --with-cpu=cortex-a9 --with-fpu=vfpv3-d16 --with-float=softfp using gcc version 4.5.0 20100401 (experimental) [trunk revision 157933] (GCC) succeeded. So that's a heavy weight work-around which might cause perf. regressions for the ARM port because it effectively disables cross-jumping. Anyway more later. cheers Ramana -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42509