From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 14389 invoked by alias); 2 Apr 2010 14:17:35 -0000 Received: (qmail 13663 invoked by uid 48); 2 Apr 2010 14:17:17 -0000 Date: Fri, 02 Apr 2010 14:17:00 -0000 Message-ID: <20100402141717.13661.qmail@sourceware.org> X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC References: Subject: [Bug tree-optimization/43627] [4.5 Regression] slow compilation (tree canonical iv takes 75%) In-Reply-To: Reply-To: gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org From: "jv244 at cam dot ac dot uk" Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org X-SW-Source: 2010-04/txt/msg00216.txt.bz2 ------- Comment #12 from jv244 at cam dot ac dot uk 2010-04-02 14:17 ------- (In reply to comment #9) > Created an attachment (id=20290) --> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=20290&action=view) [edit] > smaller testcase (needs 3s, 80% in tree canonical iv) from valgrind, I see some 13000000 cals to get_val_for / fold_binary_loc, for the small testcase -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43627