From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 3696 invoked by alias); 3 Apr 2010 19:53:42 -0000 Received: (qmail 3476 invoked by uid 48); 3 Apr 2010 19:53:25 -0000 Date: Sat, 03 Apr 2010 19:53:00 -0000 Message-ID: <20100403195325.3475.qmail@sourceware.org> X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC References: Subject: [Bug tree-optimization/43629] [4.3/4.4 Regression] Struct to register optimization fails In-Reply-To: Reply-To: gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org From: "rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org" Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org X-SW-Source: 2010-04/txt/msg00298.txt.bz2 ------- Comment #10 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-04-03 19:53 ------- (In reply to comment #9) > For 4.4 the test cases (both the original struct-using one and the later > integer-only one) are fixed by backporting r145184 (PR38180 fix) and then > r157944. Either of them alone fixes neither test case. Bootstrapped and > regression tested on x86_64-linux so far. It only needs the likely_value changes backported (for 4.3 they need to be adjusted to match the pre-tuples world). I will do the backports once 4.5.0 is out of the door. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43629