From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 5404 invoked by alias); 5 Apr 2010 14:23:48 -0000 Received: (qmail 5321 invoked by uid 48); 5 Apr 2010 14:23:28 -0000 Date: Mon, 05 Apr 2010 14:23:00 -0000 Message-ID: <20100405142328.5320.qmail@sourceware.org> X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC References: Subject: [Bug tree-optimization/42108] [4.4/4.5 Regression] 50% performance regression In-Reply-To: Reply-To: gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org From: "rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org" Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org X-SW-Source: 2010-04/txt/msg00399.txt.bz2 ------- Comment #50 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-04-05 14:23 ------- (In reply to comment #49) > At least the tree-vrp.c bit did not get applied (as of trunk r157950) > Yup, my fault. I looked at the wrong patch. Thus, the first comment applies - maybe stage1 with lots of cleanups. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42108