From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 20565 invoked by alias); 5 Apr 2010 15:28:49 -0000 Received: (qmail 20072 invoked by uid 48); 5 Apr 2010 15:28:31 -0000 Date: Mon, 05 Apr 2010 15:28:00 -0000 Message-ID: <20100405152831.20071.qmail@sourceware.org> X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC References: Subject: [Bug c++/41884] diagnostics: error vs. context In-Reply-To: Reply-To: gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org From: "bangerth at gmail dot com" Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org X-SW-Source: 2010-04/txt/msg00401.txt.bz2 ------- Comment #15 from bangerth at gmail dot com 2010-04-05 15:28 ------- FWIW, let me say that I believe that few people use -Wfatal-errors. Most of the time, experienced programmers are able to fix multiple bugs in one go-around if they get to see all error messages, and the less experienced programmers likely don't know about -Wfatal-errors. This said, I quite frequently find it annoying that the actual error message is so hard to find between the text printed above and below it. A defined place either at the top or at the bottom would be highly useful in my mind. W. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41884