From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 26391 invoked by alias); 10 Apr 2010 15:51:07 -0000 Received: (qmail 26227 invoked by uid 48); 10 Apr 2010 15:50:32 -0000 Date: Sat, 10 Apr 2010 15:51:00 -0000 Message-ID: <20100410155032.26226.qmail@sourceware.org> X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC References: Subject: [Bug fortran/34554] time compiling complicated size initialization expression In-Reply-To: Reply-To: gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org From: "dfranke at gcc dot gnu dot org" Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org X-SW-Source: 2010-04/txt/msg01038.txt.bz2 ------- Comment #6 from dfranke at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-04-10 15:50 ------- (In reply to comment #5) > I will start looking at this. Daniel, any ideas? I'd think that the fortran-exp branch tries to unroll the whole thing, which then doesn't fit into memory any more at some point. Hence the failure. One needs to reintroduce the max-constructor-size flag and stop whenever that is hit and set up the initializer on runtime. Before doing this, I intended to get rid of (or rewrite) the expand-stack as I promised at Christmas that I'd do. I'm still busy like hell (including being side-tracked by other projects) and my development machine died four week ago - still broken :( Jerry, if you want to have a go in the meantime, be my guest. I'll join in as soon as I can manage! -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=34554