From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 3280 invoked by alias); 19 Apr 2010 13:46:59 -0000 Received: (qmail 3234 invoked by uid 48); 19 Apr 2010 13:46:47 -0000 Date: Mon, 19 Apr 2010 13:46:00 -0000 Message-ID: <20100419134647.3233.qmail@sourceware.org> X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC References: Subject: [Bug fortran/43227] [4.5/4.6 Regression] ICE: segmentation fault in mio_expr In-Reply-To: Reply-To: gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org From: "janus at gcc dot gnu dot org" Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org X-SW-Source: 2010-04/txt/msg01832.txt.bz2 ------- Comment #14 from janus at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-04-19 13:46 ------- (In reply to comment #13) > > I keep forgetting this test!-(on i686-apple-darwin9, it compiles at revision > > 147438, 20090512, and fails at revision 150825, 20090817). > > That's a start. I can see two (hypothetical) candidates in this range: > > * r150725 > * r150823 I just checked r150724, which also fails. This means that both my guesses were wrong. But at least it bring us down to the range 147438:150724 (which is still three months of development). -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43227