From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 30494 invoked by alias); 20 Apr 2010 14:21:52 -0000 Received: (qmail 30366 invoked by uid 48); 20 Apr 2010 14:21:24 -0000 Date: Tue, 20 Apr 2010 14:21:00 -0000 Message-ID: <20100420142124.30365.qmail@sourceware.org> X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC References: Subject: [Bug fortran/41023] Inconsistent error locations for wrong interfaces with overloaded operators In-Reply-To: Reply-To: gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org From: "mikael at gcc dot gnu dot org" Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org X-SW-Source: 2010-04/txt/msg02050.txt.bz2 ------- Comment #5 from mikael at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-04-20 14:21 ------- Created an attachment (id=20444) --> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=20444&action=view) patch This produces : pr41023.f90:9.21: MODULE PROCEDURE myplus 1 Error: Operator interface at (1) has the wrong number of arguments and : pr41023_bis.f90:9.21: MODULE PROCEDURE myplus 1 Error: Intrinsic operator interface at (1) must be a FUNCTION -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41023