public inbox for gcc-bugs@sourceware.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [Bug fortran/43832]  New: OPEN statement not diagnosing missing unit number
@ 2010-04-21 13:47 w6ws at earthlink dot net
  2010-04-21 14:05 ` [Bug fortran/43832] " w6ws at earthlink dot net
                   ` (6 more replies)
  0 siblings, 7 replies; 8+ messages in thread
From: w6ws at earthlink dot net @ 2010-04-21 13:47 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs

An OPEN statement needs to either have a unit number in the first
item in the list, or have a UNIT= (or NEWUNIT= in F2008) keyword
somewhere else.  Here is an example where the unit number is not
specified, yet gfortran does not issue an error:

subroutine openit
  implicit none

  open (file='x')

end subroutine

This was tested with version 4.4.1 on Ubuntu linux.


-- 
           Summary: OPEN statement not diagnosing missing unit number
           Product: gcc
           Version: 4.4.1
            Status: UNCONFIRMED
          Severity: normal
          Priority: P3
         Component: fortran
        AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org
        ReportedBy: w6ws at earthlink dot net


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43832


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread

* [Bug fortran/43832] OPEN statement not diagnosing missing unit number
  2010-04-21 13:47 [Bug fortran/43832] New: OPEN statement not diagnosing missing unit number w6ws at earthlink dot net
@ 2010-04-21 14:05 ` w6ws at earthlink dot net
  2010-04-21 14:09 ` burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org
                   ` (5 subsequent siblings)
  6 siblings, 0 replies; 8+ messages in thread
From: w6ws at earthlink dot net @ 2010-04-21 14:05 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs



------- Comment #1 from w6ws at earthlink dot net  2010-04-21 14:05 -------
An additional test: with just an OPEN statement with no list, gfortran issues:

 In file miniopen.f90:4

  open ()
       1
Error: Syntax error in OPEN statement at (1)

While the message is technically correct, it would be more helpful if it
mentioned the missing unit number.


-- 


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43832


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread

* [Bug fortran/43832] OPEN statement not diagnosing missing unit number
  2010-04-21 13:47 [Bug fortran/43832] New: OPEN statement not diagnosing missing unit number w6ws at earthlink dot net
  2010-04-21 14:05 ` [Bug fortran/43832] " w6ws at earthlink dot net
@ 2010-04-21 14:09 ` burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org
  2010-04-22  0:32 ` jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org
                   ` (4 subsequent siblings)
  6 siblings, 0 replies; 8+ messages in thread
From: burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2010-04-21 14:09 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs



------- Comment #2 from burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org  2010-04-21 14:09 -------
Fortran 2008 (almost FDIS version) has:

C904 (R904) If the NEWUNIT= specifier does not appear, a file-unit-number shall
be speci\fed; if
            the optional characters UNIT= are omitted, the file-unit-number
shall be the \ffirst
            item in the connect-spec-list.


-- 

burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 CC|                            |burnus at gcc dot gnu dot
                   |                            |org


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43832


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread

* [Bug fortran/43832] OPEN statement not diagnosing missing unit number
  2010-04-21 13:47 [Bug fortran/43832] New: OPEN statement not diagnosing missing unit number w6ws at earthlink dot net
  2010-04-21 14:05 ` [Bug fortran/43832] " w6ws at earthlink dot net
  2010-04-21 14:09 ` burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2010-04-22  0:32 ` jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org
  2010-04-24 12:04 ` jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org
                   ` (3 subsequent siblings)
  6 siblings, 0 replies; 8+ messages in thread
From: jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2010-04-22  0:32 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs



------- Comment #3 from jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org  2010-04-22 00:29 -------
OK , I will see what I ca ndo.


-- 

jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
         AssignedTo|unassigned at gcc dot gnu   |jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot
                   |dot org                     |org
             Status|UNCONFIRMED                 |ASSIGNED
     Ever Confirmed|0                           |1
   Last reconfirmed|0000-00-00 00:00:00         |2010-04-22 00:29:04
               date|                            |


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43832


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread

* [Bug fortran/43832] OPEN statement not diagnosing missing unit number
  2010-04-21 13:47 [Bug fortran/43832] New: OPEN statement not diagnosing missing unit number w6ws at earthlink dot net
                   ` (2 preceding siblings ...)
  2010-04-22  0:32 ` jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2010-04-24 12:04 ` jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org
  2010-04-24 12:07 ` jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org
                   ` (2 subsequent siblings)
  6 siblings, 0 replies; 8+ messages in thread
From: jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2010-04-24 12:04 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs



------- Comment #4 from jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org  2010-04-24 12:04 -------
Subject: Bug 43832

Author: jvdelisle
Date: Sat Apr 24 12:04:09 2010
New Revision: 158684

URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=158684
Log:
2010-04-24  Jerry DeLisle  <jvdelisle@gcc.gnu.org>

        PR fortran/43832
        * io.c (gfc_match_open): Remove branch to syntax error. Add call to
        gfc_error with new error message.

Modified:
    trunk/gcc/fortran/ChangeLog
    trunk/gcc/fortran/io.c


-- 


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43832


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread

* [Bug fortran/43832] OPEN statement not diagnosing missing unit number
  2010-04-21 13:47 [Bug fortran/43832] New: OPEN statement not diagnosing missing unit number w6ws at earthlink dot net
                   ` (3 preceding siblings ...)
  2010-04-24 12:04 ` jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2010-04-24 12:07 ` jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org
  2010-04-24 12:09 ` jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org
  2010-04-24 17:01 ` hp at gcc dot gnu dot org
  6 siblings, 0 replies; 8+ messages in thread
From: jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2010-04-24 12:07 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs



------- Comment #5 from jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org  2010-04-24 12:07 -------
Subject: Bug 43832

Author: jvdelisle
Date: Sat Apr 24 12:07:07 2010
New Revision: 158685

URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=158685
Log:
2010-04-24  Jerry DeLisle  <jvdelisle@gcc.gnu.org>

        PR fortran/43832
        * gfortran.dg/open_nounit.f90: New test.

Added:
    trunk/gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/open_nounit.f90
Modified:
    trunk/gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog


-- 


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43832


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread

* [Bug fortran/43832] OPEN statement not diagnosing missing unit number
  2010-04-21 13:47 [Bug fortran/43832] New: OPEN statement not diagnosing missing unit number w6ws at earthlink dot net
                   ` (4 preceding siblings ...)
  2010-04-24 12:07 ` jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2010-04-24 12:09 ` jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org
  2010-04-24 17:01 ` hp at gcc dot gnu dot org
  6 siblings, 0 replies; 8+ messages in thread
From: jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2010-04-24 12:09 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs



------- Comment #6 from jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org  2010-04-24 12:09 -------
Fixed on trunk. Closing


-- 

jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|ASSIGNED                    |RESOLVED
         Resolution|                            |FIXED
   Target Milestone|---                         |4.6.0


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43832


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread

* [Bug fortran/43832] OPEN statement not diagnosing missing unit number
  2010-04-21 13:47 [Bug fortran/43832] New: OPEN statement not diagnosing missing unit number w6ws at earthlink dot net
                   ` (5 preceding siblings ...)
  2010-04-24 12:09 ` jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2010-04-24 17:01 ` hp at gcc dot gnu dot org
  6 siblings, 0 replies; 8+ messages in thread
From: hp at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2010-04-24 17:01 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs



------- Comment #7 from hp at gcc dot gnu dot org  2010-04-24 17:01 -------
Subject: Bug 43832

Author: hp
Date: Sat Apr 24 17:00:52 2010
New Revision: 158688

URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=158688
Log:
        PR fortran/43832
        * gfortran.dg/fgetc_3.f90: Delete bogus test.

Removed:
    trunk/gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/fgetc_3.f90
Modified:
    trunk/gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog


-- 


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43832


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2010-04-24 17:01 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 8+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2010-04-21 13:47 [Bug fortran/43832] New: OPEN statement not diagnosing missing unit number w6ws at earthlink dot net
2010-04-21 14:05 ` [Bug fortran/43832] " w6ws at earthlink dot net
2010-04-21 14:09 ` burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org
2010-04-22  0:32 ` jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org
2010-04-24 12:04 ` jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org
2010-04-24 12:07 ` jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org
2010-04-24 12:09 ` jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org
2010-04-24 17:01 ` hp at gcc dot gnu dot org

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).