------- Comment #28 from paul dot richard dot thomas at gmail dot com  2010-04-25 18:59 -------
Subject: Re:  [fortran-dev Regression] ICE: segmentation 
        fault

Janus,

Forget all of our last exchanges - I screwed up somehow with the
patch.  This has nothing to do with your problem

Sorry

Paul

On Sun, Apr 25, 2010 at 8:27 PM, Paul Richard Thomas
<paul.richard.thomas@gmail.com> wrote:
> Dear Janus,
>
> I thought that I would lend a helping hand, so I applied your latest
> patch to my fortran-dev.  Since I had left some of my array reference
> development in place, it failed to apply on
>
> ***************
> *** 2486,2492 ****
>      not to the class declared type.  */
>    vtab = gfc_find_derived_vtab (e->ts.u.derived, true);
>    gcc_assert (vtab);
> -   gfc_trans_assign_vtab_procs (&parmse->pre, vtab);
>    tmp = gfc_build_addr_expr (NULL_TREE, gfc_get_symbol_decl (vtab));
>    gfc_add_modify (&parmse->pre, ctree,
>                  fold_convert (TREE_TYPE (ctree), tmp));
> --- 2486,2492 ----
>      not to the class declared type.  */
>    vtab = gfc_find_derived_vtab (e->ts.u.derived, true);
>    gcc_assert (vtab);
> +   gfc_trans_assign_vtab_procs (&parmse->pre, e->ts.u.derived, vtab);
>    tmp = gfc_build_addr_expr (NULL_TREE, gfc_get_symbol_decl (vtab));
>    gfc_add_modify (&parmse->pre, ctree,
>                  fold_convert (TREE_TYPE (ctree), tmp));
>
> Since this was a compilable source, even with the failure, I decided
> to build it anyway. Lo and behold, the regressions have gone :-)
>
> It's just now regtesting.
>
> Please find the whole diff attached.
>
> I hope that this helps.
>
> Cheers
>
> Paul
>


-- 


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42274