From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 5497 invoked by alias); 25 Apr 2010 20:20:45 -0000 Received: (qmail 5446 invoked by uid 48); 25 Apr 2010 20:20:31 -0000 Date: Sun, 25 Apr 2010 20:20:00 -0000 Message-ID: <20100425202031.5445.qmail@sourceware.org> X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC References: Subject: [Bug fortran/42274] [fortran-dev Regression] ICE: segmentation fault In-Reply-To: Reply-To: gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org From: "sfilippone at uniroma2 dot it" Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org X-SW-Source: 2010-04/txt/msg02666.txt.bz2 ------- Comment #32 from sfilippone at uniroma2 dot it 2010-04-25 20:20 ------- (In reply to comment #30) > > Salvatore: As you heard, Paul's patch is screwed up. Maybe you could rather try > the patch in comment #23, which is clean (except for a small regression) and > fixes your original problem. Does this give the same error on your code? > Actually I tried both, and both give the same error. The obvious question is whether this is related to the patch or not. I really look forward to the merge into trunk, and I would prefer reporting the new bug against trunk. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42274