From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 31381 invoked by alias); 26 Apr 2010 14:49:40 -0000 Received: (qmail 31223 invoked by uid 48); 26 Apr 2010 14:49:08 -0000 Date: Mon, 26 Apr 2010 14:49:00 -0000 Message-ID: <20100426144908.31222.qmail@sourceware.org> X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC References: Subject: [Bug target/43729] Mach-O LTO support needed for darwin In-Reply-To: Reply-To: gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org From: "mrs at gcc dot gnu dot org" Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org X-SW-Source: 2010-04/txt/msg02733.txt.bz2 ------- Comment #8 from mrs at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-04-26 14:49 ------- One open question for me would be, are 16 bytes of an arbitrary named section/segment enough? It you carve out a slice, say lto_%d, that leaves just 12 bytes for the `name', if this big enough? -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43729